Technical issues/questions of an intermediate or advanced nature.
-
Rava
- Contributor

- Posts: 5424
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
- Location: Forests of Germany
Post#1
by Rava » 26 Nov 2020, 06:36
Downloading onlyoffice-5.0rc1-alldesktops.xzm from
https://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/por ... t/bundles/ thinking for a mere 209M approx 1 hrs is to slow
Code: Select all
/Porteus_modules/5.0/office$ wget https://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/porteus/x86_64/current/bundles/onlyoffice-5.0rc1-alldesktops.xzm
--2020-11-26 07:22:19-- https://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/porteus/x86_64/current/bundles/onlyoffice-5.0rc1-alldesktops.xzm
Resolving ftp.nluug.nl (ftp.nluug.nl)... 145.220.21.40, 2001:67c:6ec:221:145:220:21:40
Connecting to ftp.nluug.nl (ftp.nluug.nl)|145.220.21.40|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 218640384 (209M) [text/plain]
Saving to: ‘onlyoffice-5.0rc1-alldesktops.xzm’
onlyoffice-5.0r 15%[==> ] 32.49M 57.7KB/s eta 45m 46s
so I did recall fastest-mirror and ran it, but that lists ftp.nluug.nl as my quickest mirror:
Code: Select all
0.320380 http://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/porteus/
0.331711 http://ftp.cc.uoc.gr/pub/linux/porteus/
0.486881 http://linux.rz.rub.de/porteus/
0.745921 http://www6.frugalware.org/mirrors/linux/porteus/
0.755279 http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.porteus.org/
0.757574 https://mirrors.dotsrc.org/porteus/
1.503126 http://ftpmirror1.infania.net/mirror/porteus/
2.264167 http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/porteus/
3.383205 http://ftp.vim.org/ftp/os/Linux/distr/porteus/
4.000263 http://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/porteus/
…
Are all the server really that slow?

Cheers!
Yours Rava
Rava
-
Ed_P
- Contributor

- Posts: 8909
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
Post#2
by Ed_P » 26 Nov 2020, 07:00
Rava wrote: ↑26 Nov 2020, 06:36
Are all the server really that slow?
No.
Code: Select all
guest@porteus:~$ su
Password:
root@porteus:/home/guest# wget https://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/porteus/x86_64/current/bundles/onlyoffice-5.0rc1-alldesktops.xzm
--2020-11-26 01:54:29-- https://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/porteus/x86_64/current/bundles/onlyoffice-5.0rc1-alldesktops.xzm
Resolving ftp.nluug.nl (ftp.nluug.nl)... 2001:67c:6ec:221:145:220:21:40, 145.220.21.40
Connecting to ftp.nluug.nl (ftp.nluug.nl)|2001:67c:6ec:221:145:220:21:40|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 218640384 (209M) [text/plain]
Saving to: ‘onlyoffice-5.0rc1-alldesktops.xzm’
onlyoffice-5.0rc1-a 100%[===================>] 208.51M 2.75MB/s in 78s
2020-11-26 01:55:47 (2.68 MB/s) - ‘onlyoffice-5.0rc1-alldesktops.xzm’ saved [218640384/218640384]
root@porteus:/home/guest#
Took me about 1 1/2 minutes.
Cinnamon 5.0rc2 x86_64
Ed_P
-
donald
- Full of knowledge

- Posts: 2104
- Joined: 17 Jun 2013, 13:17
- Distribution: Porteus 3.2.2 XFCE 32bit
- Location: Germany
Post#3
by donald » 26 Nov 2020, 12:13
@ Rava
May have something to do with how your ISP does the peering.
I for example can not download from dl.porteus.org at a reasonable speed.
I always get only some KB/s.
donald
-
Rava
- Contributor

- Posts: 5424
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
- Location: Forests of Germany
Post#4
by Rava » 26 Nov 2020, 22:12
donald wrote: ↑26 Nov 2020, 12:13
@ Rava
May have something to do with how your ISP does the peering.
I for example can not download from dl.porteus.org at a reasonable speed.
I always get only some KB/s.
That could be, on other sites I get much higher speed of course, or else writing the article would have made no sense.
Well, it is like it is. Patience is a virtue they say. xD
But lets presume ISP does some peering, could it then be that a slower server from the fastest-mirror script could actually be a quicker one for me?
Cheers!
Yours Rava
Rava
-
cad
- Black ninja

- Posts: 69
- Joined: 06 Nov 2020, 22:40
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Post#5
by cad » 03 Dec 2020, 17:13
@ Rava
I would also think that it may have to do with your ISP. I downloaded the 267 MB porteus-4.0-i586.iso from dl.porteus.org last month, and it took just a few minutes (fast download). dl.porteus.org was also fast for me for previous downloads over the years. If you also experience this same problem (slowness) with large downloads from non-Porteus-related servers, maybe it's time to look into the elements responsible for your computer's internet connection (or complain to your ISP, perhaps?)...
cad
-
Rava
- Contributor

- Posts: 5424
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
- Location: Forests of Germany
Post#6
by Rava » 03 Dec 2020, 17:28
cad wrote: ↑03 Dec 2020, 17:13
I would also think that it may have to do with your ISP.
[…]
If you also experience this same problem (slowness) with large downloads from non-Porteus-related servers, maybe it's time to look into the elements responsible for your computer's internet connection (or complain to your ISP, perhaps?)...
It depends. I think it can vary depending on what other users nearby seem to do.
Like with my recent upload of 007-interlink-52.9.7634.linux-x86_64-gtk3_en_UK_rava_ln-interlink-bin.xzm to filehorst, I did need 4 attempts to get it up.
The transfer rate dropped to 100kB but at times even to 20kB.
When I paused the upload and restarted it it had 3.5MB and 2MB rate initially, then my ISP dropped the rate to usually 300kB.
I think that is what you get choosing a dirt-cheep ISP that guarantees not much bandwidth.
But they say
patience is a virtue. 
Cheers!
Yours Rava
Rava
-
cad
- Black ninja

- Posts: 69
- Joined: 06 Nov 2020, 22:40
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Post#7
by cad » 03 Dec 2020, 17:34
Rava wrote: ↑03 Dec 2020, 17:28
I think that is what you get choosing a dirt-cheep ISP that guarantees not much bandwidth.
So, that's what the problem is likely to be...
cad
-
Rava
- Contributor

- Posts: 5424
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
- Location: Forests of Germany
Post#8
by Rava » 03 Dec 2020, 17:40
cad wrote: ↑03 Dec 2020, 17:34
So, that's what the problem is likely to be...
*insert sad puppy here*
Seems like it, but I also have times with e.g. 60 MB downloads taking no more than one minute which I consider quick.
Cheers!
Yours Rava
Rava