I think kernel-5.9.1 by peebee, a Debian stuff has got the file /proc/config.gz in it.
Porteus Kernel Builder
-
- Shogun
- Posts: 434
- Joined: 02 May 2017, 09:51
- Distribution: v3.2.2-32 and Porteus-Artix-64
- Location: Chennai,India
Porteus Kernel Builder
Linux Kernel-4.4.272 -32 bit; Linux Kernel-5.4.185 - 64 bit
- Blaze
- DEV Team
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
- Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
- Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
- Contact:
Porteus Kernel Builder
[Updated kernel Examples]
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
Simple package (vmlinuz, 000-kernel.xzm, 06-crippled_sources-NNN-XXbit.xzm)
[5.10.3]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee config
https://disk.admlr.lipetsk.ru/s/cPPfmfaJZWzB8jm
1cf0fd8286e5491753528aad0353ee85 64bit-RES-kernel5.10.3.tar.tar
Note : Compiler that was used.
for kernel 5.10.3: 10.2.0-x86_64
Om my PC
Thanks to neko and peebee for his support.
P.S. Use at your own risk!!!
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
Simple package (vmlinuz, 000-kernel.xzm, 06-crippled_sources-NNN-XXbit.xzm)
[5.10.3]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee config
https://disk.admlr.lipetsk.ru/s/cPPfmfaJZWzB8jm
1cf0fd8286e5491753528aad0353ee85 64bit-RES-kernel5.10.3.tar.tar
Note : Compiler that was used.
for kernel 5.10.3: 10.2.0-x86_64
Om my PC

Code: Select all
[ 1.695641] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem
[ 1.697809] EXT4-fs (sdb1): warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
[ 1.699770] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: (null)
[ 1.702459] EXT4-fs (sdc1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem
[ 1.702672] random: fast init done
[ 1.722867] EXT4-fs (sdc1): warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
[ 1.730005] EXT4-fs (sdc1): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: (null)
[ 1.811643] EXT4-fs (sdc2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
Code: Select all
# e2fsck /dev/sdb1
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
/dev/sdb1 is mounted.
e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting.
P.S. Use at your own risk!!!
Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
- babam
- Warlord
- Posts: 528
- Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
- Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
- Location: Rainy city
Porteus Kernel Builder
Does the 'fsck' cheatcode work?Blaze wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 15:37[5.10.3]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee config
Om my PCCode: Select all
[ 1.695641] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem [ 1.697809] EXT4-fs (sdb1): warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended [ 1.699770] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: (null)
Are there any errors?
Code: Select all
# dmesg --level=err
Sorry, my English is bad.
- Blaze
- DEV Team
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
- Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
- Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
- Contact:
Porteus Kernel Builder
Yes, fsck is workfor me:
The same errors how at all kernels - this is issue of BIOS of my motherboard. Non-compliance with specification of MS.
Code: Select all
# umount /dev/sdc2
# fsck /dev/sdc2
fsck из util-linux 2.36.1
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
/dev/sdc2: clean, 2739/47366144 files, 5533378/189439744 blocks
# e2fsck /dev/sdc2
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
/dev/sdc2: clean, 2739/47366144 files, 5533378/189439744 blocks
Code: Select all
# dmesg --level=err
[ 0.858883] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT0._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[ 0.858899] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT0._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[ 0.860105] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT0._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[ 0.860121] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT0._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[ 0.862739] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[ 0.862754] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[ 0.863282] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT1._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[ 0.863298] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT1._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[ 0.864559] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[ 0.864575] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[ 0.874111] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT1._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[ 0.874126] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT1._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[ 0.877008] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT3._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[ 0.877024] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT3._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[ 0.878681] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT3._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[ 0.878697] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT3._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
- babam
- Warlord
- Posts: 528
- Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
- Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
- Location: Rainy city
Porteus Kernel Builder
I have tried it and so far it is running normally.
But the boot time is a bit slower.
Thanks.
Sorry, my English is bad.
- Blaze
- DEV Team
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
- Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
- Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
- Contact:
Porteus Kernel Builder
[Updated kernel Examples]
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
Simple package (vmlinuz, 000-kernel.xzm, 06-crippled_sources-NNN-XXbit.xzm)
[5.10.4]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee and neko config
64bit-RES-kernel5.10.4.tar (~148 M)
https://www.mediafire.com/file/rtxplnvr ... 5.10.4.tar
e2f24c9ec6b0afffa4025125167c83c0 64bit-RES-kernel5.10.4.tar
Note : Compiler that was used.
for kernel 5.10.4: 10.2.0-x86_64
I checked my /dev/sdb and now everything is fine - no errors with FS in dmesg:

Happy New Year to all
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
Simple package (vmlinuz, 000-kernel.xzm, 06-crippled_sources-NNN-XXbit.xzm)
[5.10.4]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee and neko config
64bit-RES-kernel5.10.4.tar (~148 M)
https://www.mediafire.com/file/rtxplnvr ... 5.10.4.tar
e2f24c9ec6b0afffa4025125167c83c0 64bit-RES-kernel5.10.4.tar
Note : Compiler that was used.
for kernel 5.10.4: 10.2.0-x86_64
I checked my /dev/sdb and now everything is fine - no errors with FS in dmesg:

Happy New Year to all

Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
- babam
- Warlord
- Posts: 528
- Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
- Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
- Location: Rainy city
Porteus Kernel Builder
5.10.3 --> 133 MB
5.10.4 --> 140 MB
Can you please tell me what the difference in config is between 5.10.3 vs 5.10.4.
Thanks.
Sorry, my English is bad.
-
- DEV Team
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
- Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
- Location: japan
Porteus Kernel Builder
@babam
It might be mainly depending on the difference between "CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y" (5.10.3) and "CONFIG_KERNEL_ZSTD=y" (5.10.4).
If you have a time, please try to rebuild kernel 5.10.4 with config changed from "CONFIG_KERNEL_ZSTD=y" to "CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y".
I am waiting for your that result.
Thanks.
It might be mainly depending on the difference between "CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y" (5.10.3) and "CONFIG_KERNEL_ZSTD=y" (5.10.4).
If you have a time, please try to rebuild kernel 5.10.4 with config changed from "CONFIG_KERNEL_ZSTD=y" to "CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y".
I am waiting for your that result.
Thanks.
- babam
- Warlord
- Posts: 528
- Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
- Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
- Location: Rainy city
Porteus Kernel Builder
@neko, Yes I understand, changing "CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y" to "CONFIG_KERNEL_ZSTD=y" only increases the kernel image size (vmlinuz)
Thanks.
Thanks.
Sorry, my English is bad.
Porteus Kernel Builder
No! It also increases the speed of decompression! 
Would it be possible to enable conditional on syscall.x32=y CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled, the same way Debian has it?

Would it be possible to enable conditional on syscall.x32=y CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled, the same way Debian has it?
Last edited by TTT on 01 Jan 2021, 13:47, edited 1 time in total.
- babam
- Warlord
- Posts: 528
- Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
- Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
- Location: Rainy city
Porteus Kernel Builder
Confused, what are you using, Porteus or APorteus? Kernel 5.10.4 or 5.11.0-rc1?
Sorry, my English is bad.
- Blaze
- DEV Team
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
- Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
- Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
- Contact:
Porteus Kernel Builder
I use Porteus (Slackware) with kernel 5.10.4 and APorteus (Arch) with 5.11.0-rc1 as farm for build kernels 

Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
Porteus Kernel Builder
I am getting exactly the same behavior with my last generation Lenovo IdeaPad with AMD graphics card, with Blaze's latest kernel Porteus Kernel Builder (Post by Blaze #80754)roadie wrote: ↑15 Dec 2020, 06:00Apparently something has changed in the kernel source for 5.10. When booting 5.10.0-rc7, I got a black screen right after starting udev and the only recourse was a hard shutdown. This has never happened with the 5.9 series up to 5.9.12. I was able to get the screen back with "nomodeset" on the command line, but it's unusable as X won't start.
The problem turned out to be my AMD graphics card and the fix that worked for me is putting the following on the command line:
Hopefully this will help someone else with AMD graphics.Code: Select all
amdgpu.dc=0
Thank you for your fix, roadie, which worked in my case as well!

- maia
- Samurai
- Posts: 123
- Joined: 08 Aug 2019, 16:56
- Distribution: Porteus-5 64b Openbox
- Location: Brasil
Porteus Kernel Builder
Tks Blaze, work on my PCBlaze wrote: ↑30 Dec 2020, 15:37
[5.10.3]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee config
https://disk.admlr.lipetsk.ru/s/cPPfmfaJZWzB8jm
1cf0fd8286e5491753528aad0353ee85 64bit-RES-kernel5.10.3.tar.tar

XZM is activated on the tmpfs

After the boot, I had a few seconds of hisss on the sound card, followed by a snap and after the sound worked normal
Nextcloud is nice

Sorry my english is really, g##gle-tr4nsl4t0r