Is there somewhere a Numbering or and Naming Convention for xzm Modules..
So I mean 003 should Desktop, 07 should Printing, 06 should Office, but what should a GFX-Application like Gimp or Multilib implementation be numbered...?
Numbering/Naming Convention
- iVAN
- Contributor
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 10 Oct 2016, 14:50
- Distribution: Windows / Linux / Porteus
- Location: Niedersachsen / Germany
Numbering/Naming Convention
..making a Porteus Module is difficult. No! It`s Easy! Difficult! No, Eaasy! Difficult! Eaaasyyy! Diffiiiiiicult! Easy! DIFFICULT!!!!! EEEEAAASSSSYYYYY!
DIIIFFIIIICUUUULT!
........................






-
- Full of knowledge
- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Re: Numbering/Naming Convention
Hi Ivan, looks like a free for all thereafter, with some users having fairly complicated numbering systems of their own.
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
- iVAN
- Contributor
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 10 Oct 2016, 14:50
- Distribution: Windows / Linux / Porteus
- Location: Niedersachsen / Germany
Re: Numbering/Naming Convention
..yes that I wanted to know, but I think a Static Numbering System for the Categories would be not the worsest way, like for office ya already have one: 06-Abiword, 06-Libreoffice, 06-Wps-Office ...Bogomips wrote:Hi Ivan, looks like a free for all thereafter, with some users having fairly complicated numbering systems of their own.
..making a Porteus Module is difficult. No! It`s Easy! Difficult! No, Eaasy! Difficult! Eaaasyyy! Diffiiiiiicult! Easy! DIFFICULT!!!!! EEEEAAASSSSYYYYY!
DIIIFFIIIICUUUULT!
........................






-
- Full of knowledge
- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Re: Numbering/Naming Convention
^ OK. So would something like this:
- 07 Graphics
- 08 Sound & Video
- 09 Internet
- 10 Programming
- 11 Administration
- 12 Accessories
- 13 Games
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8912
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
Re: Numbering/Naming Convention
I think 07 is already taken with the Printing module.
I also think the numbering of modules should be left to the admins with user created mods being named like they are in USM with the name of the module is 1st followed by the version numbers followed by the machine type the mod is designed for, like x486, x86-64, etc.
I also think the numbering of modules should be left to the admins with user created mods being named like they are in USM with the name of the module is 1st followed by the version numbers followed by the machine type the mod is designed for, like x486, x86-64, etc.
-
- Full of knowledge
- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Re: Numbering/Naming Convention
As Ed explains, you probably want the Slackware naming convention: app-version-arch-tag.xzm:
Code: Select all
app: Application Name
version: <Numeric String>.<Numeric String>[.<Numeric String>]
arch: i586/x86_64
tag: <Update Number>[Id of Module Maker if not Slackware] (See /var/log/packages)
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB