Post links to your 64bit module repos here. Repo maintainers are responsible for resolving any issues caused by their xzm's.
-
ztrapl
- Contributor

- Posts: 198
- Joined: 29 Aug 2013, 21:36
- Distribution: Porteus 3.1 KDE4 32bit
- Location: Czech Republic
Post#16
by ztrapl » 07 Apr 2016, 21:41
Jack wrote:MasterPDFEditor-3.6.30-x86_64 - Office[/quote
Where is the link at? The only link is for a older version.
Still applies that all modules are here :
https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ 
ztrapl
-
amplatfus
- Samurai

- Posts: 153
- Joined: 30 Oct 2012, 14:55
- Distribution: MATE Porteus-v5.0rc1
- Location: Romania
Post#17
by amplatfus » 08 Apr 2016, 06:12
Jack wrote:MasterPDFEditor-3.6.30-x86_64 - Office[/quote
Where is the link at? The only link is for a older version.
Thanks to the mate who upload it, here you can find it:
https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ/Office
Porteus-v5.0. rc1 MATE. Thank you all dev team and @Blaze for helping to configure it, thanks to entire Porteus community members for great topics.
Kernel: 000-kernel-5.4.8,xzm
amplatfus
-
amplatfus
- Samurai

- Posts: 153
- Joined: 30 Oct 2012, 14:55
- Distribution: MATE Porteus-v5.0rc1
- Location: Romania
Post#18
by amplatfus » 08 Apr 2016, 14:07
@ztrapl Please, any chance to have last version Google Chrome compiled as *.xzm for 64bits?
PS: sorry for my upper post from 08 Apr 2016, 08:12. I didn't read the thread before post. My fault!
All the best!
Porteus-v5.0. rc1 MATE. Thank you all dev team and @Blaze for helping to configure it, thanks to entire Porteus community members for great topics.
Kernel: 000-kernel-5.4.8,xzm
amplatfus
-
ztrapl
- Contributor

- Posts: 198
- Joined: 29 Aug 2013, 21:36
- Distribution: Porteus 3.1 KDE4 32bit
- Location: Czech Republic
Post#19
by ztrapl » 08 Apr 2016, 19:44
amplatfus wrote:@ztrapl Please, any chance to have last version Google Chrome compiled as *.xzm for 64bits?
PS: sorry for my upper post from 08 Apr 2016, 08:12. I didn't read the thread before post. My fault!
All the best!
OK. Here is the
google-chrome-49.0.2623.112-stable-x64-1.xzm
Download :
https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ - folder Internet
Enjoy 8)
ztrapl
-
amplatfus
- Samurai

- Posts: 153
- Joined: 30 Oct 2012, 14:55
- Distribution: MATE Porteus-v5.0rc1
- Location: Romania
Post#20
by amplatfus » 09 Apr 2016, 07:21
ztrapl wrote:amplatfus wrote:@ztrapl Please, any chance to have last version Google Chrome compiled as *.xzm for 64bits?
PS: sorry for my upper post from 08 Apr 2016, 08:12. I didn't read the thread before post. My fault!
All the best!
OK. Here is the
google-chrome-49.0.2623.112-stable-x64-1.xzm
Download :
https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ - folder Internet
Enjoy 8)
Thanks again. I have a issue with this module. I was using before the "
--user-data-dir %U" flag to run chrome from root and all worked fine.
Now it stop (terminal freeze) with the following error. This module works if I am logged on guest.
Code: Select all
root@porteus:~# /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome --user-data-dir %U
[4632:4632:0409/100524:ERROR:nacl_fork_delegate_linux.cc(315)] Bad NaCl helper startup ack (0 bytes)
When I run this module from older chrome with the same flag all works fine.
Please, it depends on chrome update "internally" / or is about my LXDE Porteus or we can do something to run with this flag further on?
Many thanks,
amplatfus
Porteus-v5.0. rc1 MATE. Thank you all dev team and @Blaze for helping to configure it, thanks to entire Porteus community members for great topics.
Kernel: 000-kernel-5.4.8,xzm
amplatfus
-
amplatfus
- Samurai

- Posts: 153
- Joined: 30 Oct 2012, 14:55
- Distribution: MATE Porteus-v5.0rc1
- Location: Romania
Post#21
by amplatfus » 09 Apr 2016, 07:31
amplatfus wrote:ztrapl wrote:amplatfus wrote:@ztrapl Please, any chance to have last version Google Chrome compiled as *.xzm for 64bits?
PS: sorry for my upper post from 08 Apr 2016, 08:12. I didn't read the thread before post. My fault!
All the best!
OK. Here is the
google-chrome-49.0.2623.112-stable-x64-1.xzm
Download :
https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ - folder Internet
Enjoy 8)
Thanks again. I have a issue with this module. I was using before the "
--user-data-dir %U" flag to run chrome from root and all worked fine.
Now it stop (terminal freeze) with the following error. This module works if I am logged on guest.
Code: Select all
root@porteus:~# /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome --user-data-dir %U
[4632:4632:0409/100524:ERROR:nacl_fork_delegate_linux.cc(315)] Bad NaCl helper startup ack (0 bytes)
When I run with the same flag on older chrome module all works fine.
Please, it depends on chrome update "internally" / or is about my LXDE Porteus or we can do something to run with this flag further on?
Many thanks,
amplatfus
Porteus-v5.0. rc1 MATE. Thank you all dev team and @Blaze for helping to configure it, thanks to entire Porteus community members for great topics.
Kernel: 000-kernel-5.4.8,xzm
amplatfus
-
ztrapl
- Contributor

- Posts: 198
- Joined: 29 Aug 2013, 21:36
- Distribution: Porteus 3.1 KDE4 32bit
- Location: Czech Republic
Post#22
by ztrapl » 09 Apr 2016, 10:21
@amplatfus
Code: Select all
google-chrome-stable --user-data-dir %U --no-sandbox
ztrapl
-
amplatfus
- Samurai

- Posts: 153
- Joined: 30 Oct 2012, 14:55
- Distribution: MATE Porteus-v5.0rc1
- Location: Romania
Post#23
by amplatfus » 09 Apr 2016, 10:35
ztrapl wrote:@amplatfus
Code: Select all
google-chrome-stable --user-data-dir %U --no-sandbox
worked. Thanks!
Last edited by
amplatfus on 09 Apr 2016, 13:18, edited 2 times in total.
Porteus-v5.0. rc1 MATE. Thank you all dev team and @Blaze for helping to configure it, thanks to entire Porteus community members for great topics.
Kernel: 000-kernel-5.4.8,xzm
amplatfus
-
ztrapl
- Contributor

- Posts: 198
- Joined: 29 Aug 2013, 21:36
- Distribution: Porteus 3.1 KDE4 32bit
- Location: Czech Republic
Post#24
by ztrapl » 09 Apr 2016, 10:44
amplatfus wrote:ztrapl wrote:@amplatfus
Code: Select all
google-chrome-stable --user-data-dir %U --no-sandbox
worked. Thanks!
You can also use this command:
Code: Select all
/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome --no-sandbox --user-data-dir
Enjoy 8)
ztrapl
-
amplatfus
- Samurai

- Posts: 153
- Joined: 30 Oct 2012, 14:55
- Distribution: MATE Porteus-v5.0rc1
- Location: Romania
Post#25
by amplatfus » 09 Apr 2016, 13:15
ztrapl wrote:
You can also use this command:
Code: Select all
/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome --no-sandbox --user-data-dir
Enjoy 8)
I found out this executabile script.sh in order to run chrome from root under guest terminal:
Code: Select all
sudo su guest << BASH
/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome;
BASH
So running under guest works without flags (--user-data-dir %U --no-sandbox) but without access to root folders.
BR.
Porteus-v5.0. rc1 MATE. Thank you all dev team and @Blaze for helping to configure it, thanks to entire Porteus community members for great topics.
Kernel: 000-kernel-5.4.8,xzm
amplatfus
-
francois
- Contributor

- Posts: 6499
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 14:25
- Distribution: xfce plank porteus nemesis
- Location: Le printemps, le printemps, le printemps... ... l'hiver s'essoufle.
Post#26
by francois » 09 Apr 2016, 15:43
@amplatfus:
Running google-chrome without sandbox is really not reccomended, though I like very much the idea. Personally, in root mode I work with firefox or work from root google-chrome in guest mode:
su -c chromium guest
Code: Select all
su -c /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome
You can get google-chrome to start from the kde menu editor by changing the command assorted with google-chrome. Right click on the big K.
Prendre son temps, profiter de celui qui passe.
francois
-
ztrapl
- Contributor

- Posts: 198
- Joined: 29 Aug 2013, 21:36
- Distribution: Porteus 3.1 KDE4 32bit
- Location: Czech Republic
Post#27
by ztrapl » 09 Apr 2016, 16:14
francois wrote:@amplatfus:
Running google-chrome without sandbox is really not reccomended, though I like very much the idea. Personally, in root mode I work with firefox or work from root google-chrome in guest mode:
You can get google-chrome to start from the kde menu editor by changing the command assorted with google-chrome. Right click on the big K.
@francois
These two commands are working correctly.
But which is better to use ?
Code: Select all
su guest /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome
Code: Select all
su -c /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome guest
ztrapl
-
francois
- Contributor

- Posts: 6499
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 14:25
- Distribution: xfce plank porteus nemesis
- Location: Le printemps, le printemps, le printemps... ... l'hiver s'essoufle.
Post#28
by francois » 09 Apr 2016, 17:32
@ztrapl:
It seems that both are good, but I did not examined them in detail. And you were right and I was wrong, you need to put the full path to the command, and in this peculiar case use google-chrome instead of chromium (I have corrected my mistake in the precedent post).
Prendre son temps, profiter de celui qui passe.
francois