joejac @ http://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=81&t=4706&p=34194#p34156 wrote: the mind mapping software I use

joejac @ http://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=81&t=4706&p=34194#p34156 wrote: the mind mapping software I use
http://thebrain.com/Ed_P wrote:joejac wrote: the mind mapping software I use
this is dangerous for your healthjoejac wrote: When a person is trying to untangle the sea of lies of this (every) society ...
Yes you are right Donald, I got very sick especially when the human rights of my sons and mine are continuously violated. But when having sons there is no time to stay in bed, and recovery has to be forced and the life, the pursue to freedom and truth has to continue. To get depressed is to die, and that is not an option for me, I can be upset but not depressed.donald wrote:this is dangerous for your healthjoejac wrote: When a person is trying to untangle the sea of lies of this (every) society ...
You could become depressed very quickly.(of what you will discover)
I avoid Religious issues, we already had enough wars. The Spiritual area is more or less clear to me, social philosophies and human behavior is a real mess, too many violations of human rights, with the ruler more armed and the more convincing liar, and science is plagued with falseness very well covered in favor of huge vested economic interests and in prejudice of people and technological advance. An example, more than 60 years ago we must have got rid of burning fossil fuels in favor of true clean energies. Never mind, this is out of the scope of this forum, sorry, I was just mentioning the health point to Donald. On my part, no more comments on the issue.francois wrote:What kind of truth are we talking about here. Religious, spiritual, philosophical or scientific truth?
But maybe we should do this in General chat?francois wrote:This forum is a place for the exchange of ideas and ideals. There is place for what life is all about. Which means that there could be more than simple alignment of 0 and 1. So let us just relax and discuss if you feel to do so. 8)
However, when a professor of archaeology wishes to publish a paper about human settlements in Africa which are around a million years old, he cannot get it published. This is because, in his words, it is scientific dynamite, and flies in the face of accepted theory of homo sapiens being just 250,000 years old. This is because too many academics have built their careers, reputations on the currently accepted and don't wish to be pushed out of their cosy little niches.francois wrote:Science fundamentally is not dogma, theories are constantly revised as new facts refute them. There is no right or wrong in science, things are just what they are.
Everybody/everything has a point of view. Who do you trust for information about events happening in the world?joejac wrote:I do not trust in mainstream media: newspapers, tv, radio, even their websites,
The advertising....Ed_P wrote: Who do you trust for information