Posted after 8 hours 50 minutes 20 seconds:
1) I concluded this wrongly as your wrote somewhere that porteus should have its own package manager. Sorry. The presence of slackyd does not exclude a porteus package manager and brokenman is working on it. We should all test it:fanthom wrote:@francois
1) "I have seen reading somewhere that fanthom does not intend to keep slackyd in version 1.0"
hmmm... i think it wasn't me i like slackyd very much for the '-d' option and i'm willing to keep in Porteus for a long time.
2)"-at booting still in cli mode, there are a few funy caracters (...@ or the sort)"
some processes are launched in the background to speed up getting into GUI. Could you try to discover from which precess they are coming? i have made cups starting script silent and could do the same for others if needed.
3)"-for naive users not used to root privileges, the file psswd.xzm needs root privileges to be displaced into /porteus/modules. I imagine that this has to be automated."
ok will add extra question for moving passwd.xzm to /porteus/modules
4a)"And what about rights from guest to insert other modules into /porteus/modules?"
must be done from root account i'm afraid
4b)"-if we want non-root, we will be stuck with extra procedures all the time"
that's how unix like system works (vide sudo, SUID, etc...)
Hamza, francois - pls look here:
http://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php? ... 2080#p2080
http://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php? ... 6&start=30
2)Excuse my ignorance but how do I do that^
4)The toroot cheatcode satisfies me, but not on 32 bit.
5)I was looking for a solution for the kde version.