Here is a place for your projects which are not officially supported by the Porteus Team. For example: your own kernel patched with extra features; desktops not included in the standard ISO like Gnome; base modules that are different than the standard ISO, etc...
-
igreka
- White ninja

- Posts: 29
- Joined: 05 Oct 2014, 21:48
- Distribution: porteus 3
- Location: lincoln
Post#376
by igreka » 12 Jul 2016, 11:02
Thanks for the reply Ed,
My Porteus kernel is
3.14.15 and it is running on a
DELL Inspiron 640M, dual core, 32 bits.
Attempting
usm -u usm results in the following:
Downloading: vercheck.txt DONE
An update is available for the usm database files.
Please run: usm -u all
You have the current USM version.
igreka
-
Bogomips
- Full of knowledge

- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Post#377
by Bogomips » 12 Jul 2016, 11:43
First, as a test, in always fresh mode, without saving changes in /home/guest:
Code: Select all
su
removepkg usm-latest-0.0-noarch-1
or whatever /var/log/packages has for usm.
Then download the appropriate usm package from SourceForge link to /home/guest, then
Code: Select all
installpkg usm-latest-0.0-noarch-1
if that is the package name.
Good luck.
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
Bogomips
-
igreka
- White ninja

- Posts: 29
- Joined: 05 Oct 2014, 21:48
- Distribution: porteus 3
- Location: lincoln
Post#378
by igreka » 13 Jul 2016, 10:49
It doesn't seem to work.
The
removepkg seems to work fine as it make 'usm' inaccessible.
But the
installpkg does not bring back the 'usm' command, even though it was that the package was installed.

igreka
-
Bogomips
- Full of knowledge

- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Post#379
by Bogomips » 13 Jul 2016, 11:09
Been a while since I last done something like this. Could be something to do with whiteouts, but don't think so. And nothing given for
Code: Select all
which usm
file /usr/bin/usm
file /opt/porteus-scripts/usm
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
Bogomips
-
igreka
- White ninja

- Posts: 29
- Joined: 05 Oct 2014, 21:48
- Distribution: porteus 3
- Location: lincoln
Post#380
by igreka » 13 Jul 2016, 14:06
Interestingly, which usm results in /usr/bin/usm
file /usr/bin/usm outputs /usr/bin/usm: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable
There is no usm script in /opt/porteus-scripts/
igreka
-
Bogomips
- Full of knowledge

- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Post#381
by Bogomips » 13 Jul 2016, 16:38
Code: Select all
su
which usm
file /usr/bin/usm
ls -l /usr/bin/usm
usm -v
/usr/bin/usm -v
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
Bogomips
-
igreka
- White ninja

- Posts: 29
- Joined: 05 Oct 2014, 21:48
- Distribution: porteus 3
- Location: lincoln
Post#383
by igreka » 14 Jul 2016, 12:50
Wow, thanks Ed.
The Brokenman script worked like a charm and did upgrade usm to the latest version as expected.
The repo updates work fine now including the sbo database. fantastic.
Thank you all for your inputs.
igreka
-
francois
- Contributor

- Posts: 6315
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 14:25
- Distribution: xfce plank porteus nemesis
- Location: Le printemps, le printemps, le printemps... ... l'hiver s'essoufle.
Post#384
by francois » 16 Feb 2018, 19:05
Sorry to revive that old thread. What would be the more recent one on usm and errors or bugs?
Prendre son temps, profiter de celui qui passe.
francois
-
francois
- Contributor

- Posts: 6315
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 14:25
- Distribution: xfce plank porteus nemesis
- Location: Le printemps, le printemps, le printemps... ... l'hiver s'essoufle.
Post#386
by francois » 16 Feb 2018, 19:41
Maybe we should start one explaining a few common solution to usm errors:
1) the salix database error (is it fixed for porteus 4.0?)
2) One or more errors occurred while usm was running:
FATAL ERROR!
resolve_deps 369
Please wait 6 hours for the next database update. Could not find: LIBS.TXT
And other common errors encountered. Would we have enough material for that?
Prendre son temps, profiter de celui qui passe.
francois
-
Ed_P
- Contributor

- Posts: 7677
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.0 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
Post#387
by Ed_P » 16 Feb 2018, 21:33
Most of the USM distributions have multiple mirrors. Just because one mirror is bad doesn't mean they all are. Have you tried other mirrors?
Ed
Ed_P
-
francois
- Contributor

- Posts: 6315
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 14:25
- Distribution: xfce plank porteus nemesis
- Location: Le printemps, le printemps, le printemps... ... l'hiver s'essoufle.
Post#388
by francois » 16 Feb 2018, 23:42
Are you talking about 1) the salix problem or 2) the One or more errors occurred while usm was running?
Personnaly, I have fixed 1) the salix database error by choosing another server and saved it in/porteus/rootcopy/etc/usm/mirrors-salix.txt. The rootcopy contains many of my fixes that will survive the porteus release candidate changes and even could be used for nemesis (autostart applications for example).
However, I was wondering if usm would run with minima snags. Or at least that we would have some kind of common problems and solution for usm.
Prendre son temps, profiter de celui qui passe.
francois
-
francois
- Contributor

- Posts: 6315
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 14:25
- Distribution: xfce plank porteus nemesis
- Location: Le printemps, le printemps, le printemps... ... l'hiver s'essoufle.
Post#389
by francois » 17 Feb 2018, 01:33
2) One or more errors occurred while usm was running:
FATAL ERROR!
resolve_deps 369
I am trying to build qt4.8.7 for smplayer.
Would be solved by changing mirrors
Prendre son temps, profiter de celui qui passe.
francois
-
francois
- Contributor

- Posts: 6315
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 14:25
- Distribution: xfce plank porteus nemesis
- Location: Le printemps, le printemps, le printemps... ... l'hiver s'essoufle.
Post#390
by francois » 17 Feb 2018, 01:43
Real funny, qt-4.8 from usm tried to pull so much dependencies. When I download it from pkgs.org and txz2xzm, it turns to be the only dependency needed for smplayer.

Prendre son temps, profiter de celui qui passe.
francois