PorteuX 0.2 has been released

[Ed_P]

Try a Firefox browser.

[Rava]

Or chromium.

[porteux]

Palemoon is probably not rendering Github properly. Here are the Xfce links:

Stable:
https://github.com/porteux/porteux/rele ... x86_64.iso
https://github.com/porteux/porteux/rele ... x86_64.iso
https://github.com/porteux/porteux/rele ... x86_64.iso

Current:
https://github.com/porteux/porteux/rele ... x86_64.iso
https://github.com/porteux/porteux/rele ... x86_64.iso
https://github.com/porteux/porteux/rele ... x86_64.iso

BTW, this is Palemoon 32.1.0 perfectly rendering Github: https://we.tl/t-SJAQ01bBET

[Rava]

this is Palemoon 32.1.0 perfectly rendering Github: https://we.tl/t-SJAQ01bBET

Good to know.
i already made my 32.1.0 module, but had not saved all private tabs that are currently open and that will be lost when i just quit PM to deactivate the old and activate the new module.

Since currently I have some time to spare so I work on just that.

[beny]

hi porteux i like the porteuX current and work very well,just one software you need to add to system.....polyglot,well don't seem that i use it but is useful.
and someone have to try vivaldi in my system is impressive is too fast more than chromium

[Rava]

and someone have to try vivaldi in my system is impressive is too fast more than chromium

Vivaldi sounds nice.
Is it possible to have a dark mode so that all web pages are dark / night mode while still ll elements are visible and useable?

Added in 10 minutes 25 seconds:
Update
Now that my PM is 32.1.0 the listing also works for me.

[spa_time]

@spa_time, which Intel graphics card don't work? And what exactly you mean by 'not working'?

New graphics cards are working very well..just some old graphics cards like Intel Co. 82945G
kernel driver i915..and another little problem..some wifi usb adapters are working only after changing usb port..anyway
appreciations for PorteuX..hope see it on Distrowatch...

[roro]

What is the main advantage of PorteuX over Porteus 5.0 ?
Is it worth switching at all?

[Ed_P]

Is it worth switching at all?

Only if you like it more than the other system. If not then the answer is no.

[beny]

hi Ed_P with porteuX we have slackware 15 and slackware current and one is still and other always software running upgrade, is not the same thing.

[porteux]

@roro, PorteuX added more performance and more up-to-date applications (including desktop environments) when compared to Porteus 5. Also, new releases happen in a much shorter period of time. I would say overall is a more audacious work, including the removal of some features, like 32bit packages, network boot and legacy applications like polyglot. You can see the whole changelog in the release page: https://github.com/porteux/porteux/releases

Of course, in the end it's a matter of personal preference.

[Ed_P]

one is still and other always software running upgrade,

Which one is the always software running upgrade beny? And why isn't the other one being upgraded?

[beny]

hi if the mantainer follow the slackware current upgrade list we have mesa upgraded and llvm and other... xorg samba etc etc

[Ed_P]

Isn't that what Aporteus does?

[roro]

PorteuX: big disadvantage

There are no language files (core_locales, xfce4_locales)

only English! Why?