MOFO Linux is secure, free (as in freedom and beer), and effective in penetrating "national firewalls" designed to inhibit freedom of speech. It's a specialized version of Porteus Linux, designed for overcoming internet filtering and surveillance imposed by service providers, governments, or other entities.
-
Rava
- Contributor

- Posts: 5424
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
- Location: Forests of Germany
Post#1
by Rava » 02 Oct 2015, 23:24
(Short) Info from
http://mofolinux.com/ [4.0 is based on Ubuntu base system v15.04, 64 bits, Linux kernel 3.19.0-15, therefore no longer a Porteus derivative]:
Version 2.0:
Code: Select all
Upgraded Porteus base system v2.1, 64 bits, Linux kernel 3.7.8
I2P version 0.9.8.1
L2TP/IPsec VPN support included
Upgraded Libre Office 4.1
Upgraded Firefox 21.0.0 with Flashplayer
Privoxy 3.0.21 integrated with Firefox
DNScrypt system upgraded to 1.3.3
Minor system tweaks
Generic video drivers for greater hardware compatibility
Skype version 4.2
Google Talk 4.0.3.0
Version 3.0:
Code: Select all
Upgraded Porteus base system v3.0.1, 64 bits, Linux kernel 3.14.15
Upgraded OpenVPN 2.3.2
Added SoftEther VPN and helper scripts
Added TOR 0.2.3.25 controlled by Vidalia 0.2.21
Added Bitmask 0.8.1
Added Bleachbit 1.6
Added Ecryptfs Utilities
Added Olive 1.0.16
Added Popcorn-Time 0.3.7-1
I2P 0.9.8.1
L2TP/IPsec VPN support improved [NetworkManager, Internet Security Tools]
DNScrypt system maintained at 1.3.3
Upgraded Libre Office 4.3
Upgraded Firefox 37.0.1 with Flashplayer and IcedTea Java plugins
Skype version 4.3
Google Talk 5.1.5.0
Expanded English, Chinese, and Arabic Laguage (sic!) support.
Java Runtime Environment 1.70_71
Privoxy 3.0.21 integrated with Firefox (routing for Tor, I2P, and Olive)
Python 2.7.5
Generic video drivers updated.
Veracrypt 1.0e file encryption replaces Truecrypt
___________________________________
I never ran MOFO, not any version. I just wonder, are there compatibility issues between sharing modules between version 3.0 and 4.0, since it uses a different underlying Linux userland, as in Slackware/Porteus for 3.0 and Ubuntu for 4.0? Has anyone of you tried to use MOFO modules for 4.0 with a RUNNING mofo 3.0 or tried using MOFO 3.0 modules with a running MOFO 4.0?</curious Rava is:curious>
Cheers!
Yours Rava
Rava
-
fanthom
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 5667
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 02:42
- Distribution: Porteus Kiosk
- Location: Poland
-
Contact:
Post#2
by fanthom » 03 Oct 2015, 07:42
"are there compatibility issues between sharing modules between version 3.0 and 4.0, since it uses a different underlying Linux userland, as in Slackware/Porteus for 3.0 and Ubuntu for 4.0?"
I would say yes. Ubuntu is bleeding edge and Porteus is aging. Some modules will work and other wont (dependency hell).
Please add [Solved] to your thread title if the solution was found.
fanthom
-
Rava
- Contributor

- Posts: 5424
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
- Location: Forests of Germany
Post#3
by Rava » 03 Oct 2015, 20:37
^
That's what I presumed as well..

Cheers!
Yours Rava
Rava
-
rollingscissors
- White ninja

- Posts: 4
- Joined: 04 Sep 2011, 02:25
- Distribution: Porteus 3.0.1
- Location: People's Republic of China (I outsourced myself...)
-
Contact:
Post#4
by rollingscissors » 25 Aug 2020, 11:25
Well, it is fun to see that Porteus users were interested in MOFO Linux back when I was building it with Porteus. The configuration evolved into a rather nasty kludge of modules and scripts, so I eventually switched to Ubuntu, with apt based package management. I will say that Porteus was fast, being so bloat-free. I'm trying out Porteus 5 now, just to run a lightweight and fast driver on my devices.
Cheers,
William Munny
http://mofolinux.com
rollingscissors
-
grobi
- White ninja

- Posts: 8
- Joined: 30 Apr 2025, 16:22
- Distribution: porteus puppy debian raspbian
Post#5
by grobi » 14 May 2025, 21:29
9.4.0 is out with debian sid
looks good as far as i could see CPU is high after starting apps
grobi