My savefile doesn't work.

Post here if you are a new Porteus member and you're looking for some help.
Cayman1945
Ronin
Ronin
Posts: 1
Joined: 07 Jan 2024, 12:02
Distribution: 5.1
Location: Poland

My savefile doesn't work.

Post#1 by Cayman1945 » 07 Jan 2024, 12:07

I followed savefile manager tutorial and putted UUID of my USB in porteus.cfg because I realised that after reboot my USB name changes from sdc to sdg etc. but it still doesn't work and shows I have to create savefile. My USB is formated with NTFS.
Thanks for time and help.

User avatar
AcnapyxoB
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 191
Joined: 24 Dec 2014, 10:15
Distribution: Porteus 5.01
Location: Planet Earth

My savefile doesn't work.

Post#2 by AcnapyxoB » 07 Jan 2024, 15:24

Cayman1945 wrote:
07 Jan 2024, 12:07
but it still doesn't work and shows
Try with:
changes=UUID:STrING-0F-ChARACtERS/path/savefile.dat

You can find UUID with:

Code: Select all

su
blkid | grep -A1 "dev/sd"
read more in /boot/docs/cheatcodes.txt
Porteus v5.01 KDE x86_64

User avatar
Ed_P
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 8374
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
Location: Western NY, USA

My savefile doesn't work.

Post#3 by Ed_P » 07 Jan 2024, 15:51

Cayman1945 wrote:
07 Jan 2024, 12:07
My USB is formated with NTFS.
Not a good format for USB drives. exFat is better, less overhead, faster response and supports large files.
Ed

burdi01
Shogun
Shogun
Posts: 206
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 12:09
Distribution: Slackware PartedMagic Xubuntu
Location: The Netherlands

My savefile doesn't work.

Post#4 by burdi01 » 09 Jan 2024, 16:31

Ed_P wrote:
07 Jan 2024, 15:51
Cayman1945 wrote:
07 Jan 2024, 12:07
My USB is formated with NTFS.
Not a good format for USB drives. exFat is better, less overhead, faster response and supports large files.
I tested exfat a few months ago and found it to be slower than ntfs (the fuse type) ...
:D

User avatar
Ed_P
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 8374
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
Location: Western NY, USA

My savefile doesn't work.

Post#5 by Ed_P » 09 Jan 2024, 23:39

burdi01 wrote:
09 Jan 2024, 16:31
I tested exfat a few months ago and found it to be slower than ntfs
I am truly surprised. With the journalling ntfs adds to the drive there is overhead which takes resources and time to maintain.
Ed

rych
Warlord
Warlord
Posts: 622
Joined: 04 Jan 2014, 04:27
Distribution: Porteus 5.0 x64 OpenBox
Location: NZ
Contact:

My savefile doesn't work.

Post#6 by rych » 13 Jan 2024, 06:12

burdi01 wrote:
09 Jan 2024, 16:31
I tested exfat a few months ago and found it to be slower than ntfs (the fuse type)
That's an interesting comparison indeed. Exfat must be kernel and not FUSE by now? So should be fast, and faster than ntfs-3g? We're currently testing the NTFS3 Kernel Module which should improve your comparison even further in favor of NTFS :)

Post Reply