graphics mode and copy2ram time difference
On my laptop with 8GB ram
In graphics mode : start time for Chromium 9 seconds
In copy2ram : start time for Chromium 9 seconds
No difference!
Shouldn't copy2ram be faster?
When you start it again, it's only about 2 seconds.
Why?
graphics mode and copy2ram time difference
graphics mode and copy2ram time difference
Nobody answers?
It's a pity
It's a pity
- AcnapyxoB
- Samurai
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 24 Dec 2014, 10:15
- Distribution: Porteus 5.01
- Location: Planet Earth
graphics mode and copy2ram time difference
Browsers startup time it's not base for compare, they are making cache and other stuff during startup. Real advantage from copy2ram is faster system, especially if it is loaded from slow speed USB flash drives.
Porteus v5.01 KDE x86_64