graphics mode and copy2ram time difference

Post here if you are a new Porteus member and you're looking for some help.
roro
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 65
Joined: 04 Aug 2022, 08:41
Distribution: Porteus 5.0 XFCE

graphics mode and copy2ram time difference

Post#1 by roro » 01 Oct 2022, 11:04

graphics mode and copy2ram time difference

On my laptop with 8GB ram

In graphics mode : start time for Chromium 9 seconds
In copy2ram : start time for Chromium 9 seconds
No difference!

Shouldn't copy2ram be faster?

When you start it again, it's only about 2 seconds.
Why?

roro
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 65
Joined: 04 Aug 2022, 08:41
Distribution: Porteus 5.0 XFCE

graphics mode and copy2ram time difference

Post#2 by roro » 07 Oct 2022, 07:32

Nobody answers?
It's a pity

User avatar
AcnapyxoB
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 191
Joined: 24 Dec 2014, 10:15
Distribution: Porteus 5.01
Location: Planet Earth

graphics mode and copy2ram time difference

Post#3 by AcnapyxoB » 07 Oct 2022, 19:18

roro wrote:
01 Oct 2022, 11:04
graphics mode and copy2ram time difference
Browsers startup time it's not base for compare, they are making cache and other stuff during startup. Real advantage from copy2ram is faster system, especially if it is loaded from slow speed USB flash drives.
Porteus v5.01 KDE x86_64

Post Reply