Porteus Kernel Builder

Here is a place for your projects which are not officially supported by the Porteus Team. For example: your own kernel patched with extra features; desktops not included in the standard ISO like Gnome; base modules that are different than the standard ISO, etc...
User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 2873
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc2 + 4.0 i586 XFCe
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#991 by Rava » 02 Nov 2020, 05:52

babam wrote:
02 Nov 2020, 01:05
@Rava
All versions of Porteus can use the kernel created by Blaze.
I even use it for Porteus 3.2.2 and it works great.
How did he work that magic?
Did you try to compile a NVidia driver on it?
Cause that needs the exact same compiler version as there is in the system.

Did you try running rc.FireWall start and did it start up correctly? Also here it is about the correct kernel vs compiler, but not as tricky as with the NVidia driver compiling.
Cheers!
Yours Rava

User avatar
babam
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 181
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 3.2.2 Xfce K5.10.5
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#992 by babam » 02 Nov 2020, 06:42

@Rava
I never compile NVidia driver.
Maybe the compiler version should match the compiler version on which to build the kernel.
Sorry, my English is bad.

User avatar
babam
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 181
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 3.2.2 Xfce K5.10.5
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#993 by babam » 02 Nov 2020, 06:59

@Blaze
Looks like the 'fsck' cheatcode doesn't work on kernel 5.9.2 (peebee config).
Sorry, my English is bad.

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 2873
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc2 + 4.0 i586 XFCe
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#994 by Rava » 02 Nov 2020, 10:05

babam wrote:
02 Nov 2020, 06:42
I never compile NVidia driver.
Maybe the compiler version should match the compiler version on which to build the kernel.
The compiler in the system must be the very same as the compiler that was used when compiling the kernel, or the NVidia driver compilation will fail.
Cheers!
Yours Rava

User avatar
babam
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 181
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 3.2.2 Xfce K5.10.5
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#995 by babam » 02 Nov 2020, 14:32

Rava wrote:
02 Nov 2020, 10:05
The compiler in the system must be the very same as the compiler that was used when compiling the kernel, or the NVidia driver compilation will fail.
It's simple, use the same kernel for different version of Porteus.

For example, I was able to build a NTFS3 kernel module on Porteus 5.0rc2 (kernel 5.4.57 and gcc 10.2.0) then I used that NTFS3 kernel module for Porteus 3.2.2

If I compile it on Porteus 3.2.2 (kernel 5.4.57 and gcc 5.3.0) then it will fail.
Sorry, my English is bad.

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 2873
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc2 + 4.0 i586 XFCe
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#996 by Rava » 02 Nov 2020, 16:57

babam wrote:
02 Nov 2020, 14:32
It's simple, use the same kernel for different version of Porteus.
010-nvidia-340.108-k.5.4.30-porteus-v5.0-x86_64_rava.xzm is the newest NVidia driver I was able to create for the 340 version that I (and others) need for older hardware.
My first setup for Porteus 5.0rc2 was with that kernel but it utterly crashed during bootup, so I changed it back to the ugly standard X and try rc2 out as it is, and will try using my kernel once again when I learned a bit more about rc2.
Cheers!
Yours Rava

maia
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 56
Joined: 08 Aug 2019, 16:56
Distribution: Porteus 5 rc2 < 64b Openbox
Location: Brasil

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#997 by maia » 04 Nov 2020, 12:03

babam wrote:
02 Nov 2020, 06:59
@Blaze
Looks like the 'fsck' cheatcode doesn't work on kernel 5.9.2 (peebee config).
I have noticed this behavior since newer kernel versions ex: 5.6. I can only use fsck after boot.
Sorry my English is bad.
My English is very very very bad.
My English is really, g##gle-tr4nsl4t0r

maia
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 56
Joined: 08 Aug 2019, 16:56
Distribution: Porteus 5 rc2 < 64b Openbox
Location: Brasil

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#998 by maia » 04 Nov 2020, 12:09

Blaze wrote:
01 Nov 2020, 09:37
[Updated kernel Examples]
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
Simple package (vmlinuz, 000-kernel.xzm, 06-crippled_sources-NNN-XXbit.xzm)
The compilation kernel did not present this ext4 error message. Do you believe it may be related to your card's chipset or some configuration in the .config file?
Sorry my English is bad.
My English is very very very bad.
My English is really, g##gle-tr4nsl4t0r

User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3089
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#999 by Blaze » 05 Dec 2020, 09:04

maia, :pardon:

[Updated kernel Examples]
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
Simple package (vmlinuz, 000-kernel.xzm, 06-crippled_sources-NNN-XXbit.xzm)

[5.4.81] <-- NEW : "All patches" patching was done.
64bit-ALL-kernel5.4.81.tar (~98 M)
https://disk.admlr.lipetsk.ru/s/nDPAptocQeXsbsf
2e8a01778321d73ae516e6fc44a95bd5 64bit-ALL-kernel5.4.81.tar

Note : Compiler that was used.
for kernel 5.4.81: 10.2.0-x86_64

Thanks to neko for his support.
Linux 5.4.85-porteus #1 SMP Wed Dec 23 12:36:37 UTC 2020 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Tobago PRO [Radeon R7 360 / R9 360 OEM] (rev 81) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

dorohov.alex77
White ninja
White ninja
Posts: 5
Joined: 25 Apr 2020, 05:47
Distribution: Porteus i586

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1000 by dorohov.alex77 » 08 Dec 2020, 09:14

Blaze thanks for your support.

maia
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 56
Joined: 08 Aug 2019, 16:56
Distribution: Porteus 5 rc2 < 64b Openbox
Location: Brasil

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1001 by maia » 12 Dec 2020, 14:13

Blaze wrote:
05 Dec 2020, 09:04
maia, :pardon:


:pardon: <<<< there is no need :) :) :)
Sorry my English is bad.
My English is very very very bad.
My English is really, g##gle-tr4nsl4t0r

User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3089
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1002 by Blaze » 13 Dec 2020, 16:59

Any news about aufs5 for kernel 5.10 ?
Linux 5.4.85-porteus #1 SMP Wed Dec 23 12:36:37 UTC 2020 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Tobago PRO [Radeon R7 360 / R9 360 OEM] (rev 81) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

beny
Full of knowledge
Full of knowledge
Posts: 944
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 11:33
Location: italy

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1003 by beny » 13 Dec 2020, 17:14

hi blaze, neko seem to work on overlayfs, aufs maintainer is not operative yet.....

peebee
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 38
Joined: 13 Oct 2013, 15:31
Distribution: 4
Location: UK

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1004 by peebee » 13 Dec 2020, 19:26

Blaze wrote:
13 Dec 2020, 16:59
Any news about aufs5 for kernel 5.10 ?
Junjiro R. Okajima has been heard from.....
He is working on 5.8 and has requested feedback on the aufs-users email list : https://sourceforge.net/p/aufs/mailman/ ... /37174765/
He has also produced some unofficial patch material for 5.10 :
https://github.com/sfjro/aufs5-standalo ... -736706823
which can be downloaded from :
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lxpup/ ... s-changes/

peebee
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 38
Joined: 13 Oct 2013, 15:31
Distribution: 4
Location: UK

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1005 by peebee » 14 Dec 2020, 09:10

5.10 has been released https://www.kernel.org/

Post Reply