Porteus Kernel Builder

Here is a place for your projects which are not officially supported by the Porteus Team. For example: your own kernel patched with extra features; desktops not included in the standard ISO like Gnome; base modules that are different than the standard ISO, etc...
User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 2861
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#811 by Blaze » 13 Feb 2020, 12:52

hwclock iopl() port access failed: function not implemented - the same on the 5.5.2 kernel build by neko

Отправлено спустя 1 день 2 часа 51 минуту 39 секунд:
Blaze wrote:
13 Feb 2020, 12:52
hwclock iopl() port access failed: function not implemented - the same on the 5.5.2 kernel build by neko
The same error on the 5.4.19 kernel build by neko
Linux 5.4.8-porteus #1 SMP Sun Jan 5 09:14:47 UTC 2020 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Tobago PRO [Radeon R7 360 / R9 360 OEM] (rev 81) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

neko
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 1635
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
Location: japan

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#812 by neko » 14 Feb 2020, 16:32

@evergreen
@Blaze
Please tell me the procedure to reproduce the message.

Thanks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boot Porteus-OPENBOX-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso + 5.5.2/5.6.0-rc1

Code: Select all

% su
# hwclock

User avatar
evergreen
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 82
Joined: 27 Mar 2016, 16:58
Distribution: Ignis OS, Porteus x86_64
Location: Argentine, Patagonia
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#813 by evergreen » 14 Feb 2020, 17:10

Dear @neko

In my case it appear after modules are loaded it is when everything is booting, previously to start x.
I did a second try with a clean system Porteus-OPENBOX-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso + 5.6.0-rc1
using this modules http://www.mediafire.com/file/3x1bm9k2y ... .6-rc1.tar
Maybe there is some changues with your script to compile Kernel, I would like to have better knowledges to support you.
Thanks to give us the latest Kernel out of the box to use I really appreciate a lot your work
Last edited by evergreen on 15 Feb 2020, 00:00, edited 1 time in total.
AMD A8-7410, APU AMD Radeon R5 Graphics M330

User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 2861
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#814 by Blaze » 14 Feb 2020, 18:51

Every boots up of Porteus on the init step - X does not started, I see this error and I start X manually.
Linux 5.4.8-porteus #1 SMP Sun Jan 5 09:14:47 UTC 2020 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Tobago PRO [Radeon R7 360 / R9 360 OEM] (rev 81) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 2480
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc1 x86-64 XFCe
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#815 by Rava » 14 Feb 2020, 20:38

Blaze wrote:
14 Feb 2020, 18:51
Every boots up of Porteus on the init step - X does not started, I see this error and I start X manually.
I always start Porteus is text mode (cheatcode "3") and start it manually from a guest virtual terminal, I presume that's the reason why I did not get any errors running the 5.4.19 kernel.
Cheers!
Yours Rava

beny
Full of knowledge
Full of knowledge
Posts: 855
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 11:33
Location: italy

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#816 by beny » 14 Feb 2020, 21:25

someone can try haveged from sbo maybe can help..

User avatar
ncmprhnsbl
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 2479
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 03:42
Distribution: 5.0rc1-64bit all-DE+more
Location: australia
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#817 by ncmprhnsbl » 14 Feb 2020, 22:50

i think maybe:
CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=y
some possible relevant discussion here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/434410
something to do with whether hw clock(cmos) is set to utc or local?
don't know if setting:
CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=n
would cause some problem if hwclock is set to local..
should be noted, that apart from that message (hwclock iopl() port access failed: function not implemented) .. there doesn't appear to be any other ill effect...
Forum Rules : https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=44

neko
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 1635
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
Location: japan

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#818 by neko » 15 Feb 2020, 06:40

@evergreen
@Blaze
@Rava
@beny
@ncmprhnsbl

The cause of the kernel build due to the "hwclock" problem has not yet been identified.
Therefore I will hold this issue and update the new build example.


Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most recent version of build examples was updated.

=== XZ version ===
Kernel Version: 5.5.4, 5.4.20, 4.19.104


New Compiler version is gcc-9.2.1+20200130-x86_64-2.


Please refer to the top article of this thread.
Porteus Kernel Builder


Thanks.

User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 2861
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#819 by Blaze » 15 Feb 2020, 16:47

neko, I fixed this issue via update glibc from Slackware-current.
Linux 5.4.8-porteus #1 SMP Sun Jan 5 09:14:47 UTC 2020 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Tobago PRO [Radeon R7 360 / R9 360 OEM] (rev 81) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

neko
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 1635
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
Location: japan

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#820 by neko » 16 Feb 2020, 03:57

@Blaze
Thanks for your wonderful analysis !!


Thanks.

neko
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 1635
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
Location: japan

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#821 by neko » 17 Feb 2020, 09:35

Most recent version of build examples was updated.

=== XZ version ===
Kernel Version: 5.6-rc2

Note 1: AUFS patch "5.6" is not yet ready, and
AUFS patch "5.x-rcN-20200203" is not yet ready for kernel version 5.6-rc2.
"fs/Kconfig" and "fs/Makefile" were patched same as "Note 3" of Porteus Kernel Builder (Post by neko #75872)

Note 2: syntax error of "fs/aufs/procfs.c"
"fs/aufs/procfs.c" was patched same as "Note 4" of Porteus Kernel Builder (Post by neko #75872)

These patches are not guaranteed.


Please refer to the top article of this thread.
Porteus Kernel Builder


Thanks.

neko
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 1635
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
Location: japan

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#822 by neko » 20 Feb 2020, 04:54

Most recent version of build examples was updated.
=== XZ version ===
Kernel Version: 5.5.5, 5.4.21, 4.19.105



Please refer to the top article of this thread.
Porteus Kernel Builder


Thanks.

neko
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 1635
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
Location: japan

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#823 by neko » 20 Feb 2020, 11:45

Thank you for referring to this thread.

Suddenly, I will rest for a while.
I hope you build your own kernel.

Good luck !!

babam
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 72
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 3.2.2
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#824 by babam » 22 Feb 2020, 15:36

neko, thank you very much. I hope you come back soon.
Sorry, my English is bad.

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 2480
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc1 x86-64 XFCe
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#825 by Rava » 25 Feb 2020, 21:54

neko wrote:
20 Feb 2020, 11:45
Thank you for referring to this thread.

Suddenly, I will rest for a while.
neko, thanks for all you done, your kernel builder is an amazing piece of software.

Take all the time you need. :)
Cheers!
Yours Rava

Post Reply