Porteus Kernel Builder

Here is a place for your projects which are not officially supported by the Porteus Team. For example: your own kernel patched with extra features; desktops not included in the standard ISO like Gnome; base modules that are different than the standard ISO, etc...
raja
Shogun
Shogun
Posts: 434
Joined: 02 May 2017, 09:51
Distribution: v3.2.2-32 and Porteus-Artix-64
Location: Chennai,India

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1021 by raja » 29 Dec 2020, 09:51

Blaze wrote:
27 Dec 2020, 14:15

Where I can download peebee config?
I think kernel-5.9.1 by peebee, a Debian stuff has got the file /proc/config.gz in it.
Linux Kernel-4.4.272 -32 bit; Linux Kernel-5.4.185 - 64 bit

User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3870
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1022 by Blaze » 30 Dec 2020, 15:37

[Updated kernel Examples]
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
Simple package (vmlinuz, 000-kernel.xzm, 06-crippled_sources-NNN-XXbit.xzm)

[5.10.3]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee config
https://disk.admlr.lipetsk.ru/s/cPPfmfaJZWzB8jm
1cf0fd8286e5491753528aad0353ee85 64bit-RES-kernel5.10.3.tar.tar

Note : Compiler that was used.
for kernel 5.10.3: 10.2.0-x86_64

Om my PC
Image

Code: Select all

[    1.695641] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem
[    1.697809] EXT4-fs (sdb1): warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
[    1.699770] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: (null)
[    1.702459] EXT4-fs (sdc1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem
[    1.702672] random: fast init done
[    1.722867] EXT4-fs (sdc1): warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
[    1.730005] EXT4-fs (sdc1): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: (null)
[    1.811643] EXT4-fs (sdc2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)

Code: Select all

# e2fsck /dev/sdb1
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
/dev/sdb1 is mounted.
e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting.
Thanks to neko and peebee for his support.

P.S. Use at your own risk!!!
Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

User avatar
babam
Warlord
Warlord
Posts: 526
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1023 by babam » 30 Dec 2020, 16:18

Blaze wrote:
30 Dec 2020, 15:37
[5.10.3]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee config

Om my PC

Code: Select all

[    1.695641] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem
[    1.697809] EXT4-fs (sdb1): warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
[    1.699770] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: (null)
Does the 'fsck' cheatcode work?
Are there any errors?

Code: Select all

# dmesg --level=err
I think we should focus on kernel 5.10 and higher because the next Porteus will have to use kernel 5.10 or higher (based on Slackware-Current)
Sorry, my English is bad.

User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3870
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1024 by Blaze » 31 Dec 2020, 07:33

Yes, fsck is workfor me:

Code: Select all

# umount /dev/sdc2
# fsck /dev/sdc2
fsck из util-linux 2.36.1
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
/dev/sdc2: clean, 2739/47366144 files, 5533378/189439744 blocks
# e2fsck /dev/sdc2
e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
/dev/sdc2: clean, 2739/47366144 files, 5533378/189439744 blocks
The same errors how at all kernels - this is issue of BIOS of my motherboard. Non-compliance with specification of MS.

Code: Select all

# dmesg --level=err
[    0.858883] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT0._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[    0.858899] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT0._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[    0.860105] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT0._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[    0.860121] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT0._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[    0.862739] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[    0.862754] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[    0.863282] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT1._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[    0.863298] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT1._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[    0.864559] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[    0.864575] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[    0.874111] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT1._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[    0.874126] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT1._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[    0.877008] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT3._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[    0.877024] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT3._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
[    0.878681] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT3._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20200925/psargs-330)
[    0.878697] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT3._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20200925/psparse-529)
Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

User avatar
babam
Warlord
Warlord
Posts: 526
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1025 by babam » 31 Dec 2020, 13:52

Blaze wrote:
30 Dec 2020, 15:37
[5.10.3]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee config
I have tried it and so far it is running normally.
But the boot time is a bit slower.

Thanks.
Sorry, my English is bad.

User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3870
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1026 by Blaze » 01 Jan 2021, 10:48

[Updated kernel Examples]
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
Simple package (vmlinuz, 000-kernel.xzm, 06-crippled_sources-NNN-XXbit.xzm)

[5.10.4]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee and neko config
64bit-RES-kernel5.10.4.tar (~148 M)
https://www.mediafire.com/file/rtxplnvr ... 5.10.4.tar
e2f24c9ec6b0afffa4025125167c83c0 64bit-RES-kernel5.10.4.tar

Note : Compiler that was used.
for kernel 5.10.4: 10.2.0-x86_64

I checked my /dev/sdb and now everything is fine - no errors with FS in dmesg:
Image

Happy New Year to all :beer:
Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

User avatar
babam
Warlord
Warlord
Posts: 526
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1027 by babam » 01 Jan 2021, 11:44

Blaze wrote:
01 Jan 2021, 10:48
[Updated kernel Examples]
==== AUFS Kernel only for Porteus ====
[5.10.4]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee and neko config
5.10.3 --> 133 MB
5.10.4 --> 140 MB
Can you please tell me what the difference in config is between 5.10.3 vs 5.10.4.

Thanks.
Sorry, my English is bad.

neko
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 2109
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
Location: japan

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1028 by neko » 01 Jan 2021, 12:17

@babam
It might be mainly depending on the difference between "CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y" (5.10.3) and "CONFIG_KERNEL_ZSTD=y" (5.10.4).

If you have a time, please try to rebuild kernel 5.10.4 with config changed from "CONFIG_KERNEL_ZSTD=y" to "CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y".
I am waiting for your that result.

Thanks.

User avatar
babam
Warlord
Warlord
Posts: 526
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1029 by babam » 01 Jan 2021, 12:46

@neko, Yes I understand, changing "CONFIG_KERNEL_XZ=y" to "CONFIG_KERNEL_ZSTD=y" only increases the kernel image size (vmlinuz)

Thanks.
Sorry, my English is bad.

TTT
White ninja
White ninja
Posts: 5
Joined: 29 Nov 2020, 20:47
Distribution: Porteus 3.2.2 XFCE 32bit

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1030 by TTT » 01 Jan 2021, 13:39

No! It also increases the speed of decompression! :celebrate14:
Would it be possible to enable conditional on syscall.x32=y CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled, the same way Debian has it?
Last edited by TTT on 01 Jan 2021, 13:47, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
babam
Warlord
Warlord
Posts: 526
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1031 by babam » 01 Jan 2021, 13:45

TTT wrote:
01 Jan 2021, 13:39
No! It also increases the speed of decompression! :celebrate14:
Yes
Sorry, my English is bad.

User avatar
babam
Warlord
Warlord
Posts: 526
Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 10:30
Distribution: Porteus 5.0rc3 Xfce K6.1.1
Location: Rainy city

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1032 by babam » 02 Jan 2021, 12:31

Blaze wrote:
01 Jan 2021, 10:48
[5.10.4]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee and neko config

Image
Confused, what are you using, Porteus or APorteus? Kernel 5.10.4 or 5.11.0-rc1?
Sorry, my English is bad.

User avatar
Blaze
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3870
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
Contact:

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1033 by Blaze » 02 Jan 2021, 13:26

I use Porteus (Slackware) with kernel 5.10.4 and APorteus (Arch) with 5.11.0-rc1 as farm for build kernels :D
Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16

User avatar
cad
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 69
Joined: 06 Nov 2020, 22:40
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1034 by cad » 02 Jan 2021, 19:35

roadie wrote:
15 Dec 2020, 06:00
Apparently something has changed in the kernel source for 5.10. When booting 5.10.0-rc7, I got a black screen right after starting udev and the only recourse was a hard shutdown. This has never happened with the 5.9 series up to 5.9.12. I was able to get the screen back with "nomodeset" on the command line, but it's unusable as X won't start.

The problem turned out to be my AMD graphics card and the fix that worked for me is putting the following on the command line:

Code: Select all

amdgpu.dc=0
Hopefully this will help someone else with AMD graphics.
I am getting exactly the same behavior with my last generation Lenovo IdeaPad with AMD graphics card, with Blaze's latest kernel Porteus Kernel Builder (Post by Blaze #80754)
Thank you for your fix, roadie, which worked in my case as well! :)

User avatar
maia
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 116
Joined: 08 Aug 2019, 16:56
Distribution: Porteus-5 64b Openbox
Location: Brasil

Porteus Kernel Builder

Post#1035 by maia » 03 Jan 2021, 01:51

Blaze wrote:
30 Dec 2020, 15:37

[5.10.3]<-- NEW : restricted version base on peebee config
https://disk.admlr.lipetsk.ru/s/cPPfmfaJZWzB8jm
1cf0fd8286e5491753528aad0353ee85 64bit-RES-kernel5.10.3.tar.tar
Tks Blaze, work on my PC :)

XZM is activated on the tmpfs :)

After the boot, I had a few seconds of hisss on the sound card, followed by a snap and after the sound worked normal

Nextcloud is nice :)
Sorry my english is really, g##gle-tr4nsl4t0r

Post Reply