Page 3 of 5

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 17 Feb 2016, 14:21
by datruche
datruche wrote:Build finished in > one hour time and jeeeh... we're talking of a 260 + 55 MiB for webkitfltk andd fifth!
That was with default build. Now with build = "release", also x86_64:

Code: Select all

warning: webkitfltk-0.4-1 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...

Packages (1) webkitfltk-0.4-1

Total Installed Size:   121.09 MiB              «---
Net Upgrade Size:      -133.10 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] 

warning: fifth-0.4-1 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...

Packages (1) fifth-0.4-1

Total Installed Size:   24.66 MiB              «---
Net Upgrade Size:      -31.86 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
Defualt build package was 305 MB installed; "release" build =145 MB ...Jeeeez!

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 17 Feb 2016, 17:29
by fullmoonremix
Salutatiions... :good:

This what I'm getting from src2pkg with the "hacked" webkitfltk (w/ installed Ruby build dependency)... :wall:

Code: Select all

root@porteus:/tmp# src2pkg -CWD -O -i='make install' -m='make dep all' webkitfltk-0.4.txz
Found source archive: webkitfltk-0.4.txz
Deleting old build files - Done
Creating working directories:
   PKG_DIR=/tmp/webkitfltk-0.4-x86_64-1
   OBJ_DIR=/tmp/webkitfltk-0.4-obj-1
   SRC_DIR=/tmp/webkitfltk-0.4-src-1
Unpacking source archive - Done
Correcting source permissions - Done
Checking for patches - None found
Skipping configure_source - 
Compiling sources - Using: 'make dep all'
ERROR! Compiling source code has failed.
This usually happens because of missing libraries, or
badly written Makefiles or configure scripts.
Sorry! No Dependency or Requirements information found.
Best Regards... :beer:

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 17 Feb 2016, 22:11
by datruche
@fullmoon did you look on cemi's github issues?

Well here is Fifth-0.4 running on Porteus Nemesis 3.5 (made it finaly thanks to Fifth dev and a bit of Arch background)
Image
Look at the whole bundle module size :roll:

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 17 Feb 2016, 22:22
by fullmoonremix
Salutations... :good:

I have not looked yet @ those issues. In any case... @ present Fifth is do able for Nemesis but NOT for Slackware Porteus.

Best Regards... :beer:

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 17 Feb 2016, 23:08
by datruche
Hi!

Note it's a donkey browser. Displays page X fine (screenshot), then not and so on.

Well if the pkg.tar.xz packages get your interest, I'll share 'em with you fullmoon.

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 18 Feb 2016, 01:11
by fullmoonremix
Salutations... :good:

Sounds like a plan. I can do a right click menu conversion (eg. tar.xz2xzm).
To do the conversion... the "ar." get's dropped leaving "txz" which can be converted to "xzm".

I will also continue to attempt to do a slackware build (as you can see... :oops: I need the practice).

Many thanks... :good: this will speed up my 003-pekwm derivative project.

Best Regards... :beer:

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 18 Feb 2016, 21:43
by datruche
Hi fullmoon ! here are webkitfltk, fifth and dependancy -x86_64:

http://sysadmin.lliseil.fr/linux/repo/a ... pkg.tar.xz}

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 18 Feb 2016, 23:51
by fullmoonremix
Salutations... :good:

Thanks for the link... datruche. Unfortunately... I am not getting a connection to that url with Palemoon.

@ cemi... I'm curious... Palemoon uses a GCC (GNU C Compiler) optimization... :unknown:
This is a powerful feature. Is this in the road map for Fifth?

Best Regards... :beer:

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 19 Feb 2016, 00:39
by datruche
They work, I checked it. You removed the brackets? They're used to act on any number of files when you want not to type all the path more than once, on comand line.

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 19 Feb 2016, 09:29
by cemi
fullmoonremix wrote:@ cemi... I'm curious... Palemoon uses a GCC (GNU C Compiler) optimizer... :unknown:
This is a powerful feature. Is this in the road map for Fifth?
Sorry, what do you mean? The compiler and optimizations are upto the person building it.

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 19 Feb 2016, 11:25
by fullmoonremix
Salutations... :good:

-03 switch optimization... :wink:
Pale Moon (web browser): Optimization

Best Regards... :beer:

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 19 Feb 2016, 18:35
by cemi
Yes, that depends on the builder. My own builds use -O3 -flto and a few other options.

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 19 Feb 2016, 23:53
by fullmoonremix
Salutations... :good:
The JIT is disabled, as it was too unstable
Is restoring a stabilized JIT in the road map?

@ datruche... the link takes me here... http://sysadmin.lliseil.fr/linux/ using Palemoon. :wall:

Best Regards... :beer:

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 20 Feb 2016, 01:06
by datruche
You removed the brackets Fullemoon? Asked you already.

Re: Palemoon/Slimjet alternative?

Posted: 20 Feb 2016, 01:24
by fullmoonremix
Salutations... :good:

Tried it both ways... with and without.

Best Regards... :beer: