Page 1 of 1
Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 01 Jul 2015, 19:19
by Bogomips
At the moment am refining my procedure for
Resolving Non-Slackware Dependencies. So if there is a reasonable module request, will be glad to use it for testing purposes to see how the updated procedure behaves in producing said module. 8)
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 01 Jul 2015, 19:30
by Seva
open xcom
retroarch
dungeon crawl: stone soup
dwarf fortress
doom rl
любые игры для линукса, лучше не очень требовательные
64 бит, 2015 год на дворе
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 02 Jul 2015, 02:06
by francois
This is a great offer bogomips.
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 02 Jul 2015, 14:18
by Bogomips
Seva wrote:open xcom
retroarch
dungeon crawl: stone soup
dwarf fortress
doom rl
Package name required if to be worthy of consideration:
Seva wrote:dungeon crawl: stone soup
doom rl
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 02 Jul 2015, 14:41
by Seva
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 02 Jul 2015, 19:02
by Bogomips
Package name that should have been provided:
stone-soup
No package.
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 02 Jul 2015, 19:36
by Seva
there is a stone soup package on that slackonly link
for doom rl i only have tar.gz
both are good games, doom rl is quite fun and quick, and its DOOM
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 03 Jul 2015, 20:30
by Bogomips
dwarffortress
Got dependencies sorted, but there is versioning problem. Using libstdc++.so.6.0 required by
dwarffortress results in demand for versioned libc.so.6:
Code: Select all
usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.21
overlaying
libstdc++.so.6.0: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.18
guest@porteus:~$ dwarffortress
./libs/Dwarf_Fortress: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.18' not found (required by /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6)
Using libstdc++.so.6.0 existing on system:
Code: Select all
libstdc++.so.6.0: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.18
guest@porteus:~$ dwarffortress
./libs/Dwarf_Fortress: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.8' not found (required by /opt/dwarffortress/libs/libgraphics.so)
Not going to waste time on fixing up versioning. Furthermore anything going wrong with libstdc++.so.6 is anathaema to whole X system. Versioning inconsistency clobbered X.
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 03 Jul 2015, 21:19
by Seva
i tried usm for dwarf fortress, nothing found
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 04 Jul 2015, 13:43
by ztrapl
Seva wrote:i tried usm for dwarf fortress, nothing found
If I can see that you Porteus XFCE Desktop 3.1 64bit.
Then what are you doing in this discussion. This discussion is i486 not x86_64.
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 04 Jul 2015, 16:53
by Bogomips
Suppose our friend is looking forward to playing a game after having downloaded a 32 bit KDE iso.
Re: Reasonable Module Request
Posted: 04 Jul 2015, 17:43
by Seva
its 2015, 64 bit is much more relevant