To your machines, get set: comparative studies of porteus
Posted: 08 May 2011, 00:20
To your machines, get set: comparative studies of the basic operating system porteus v. rc1.0 vs ...
windows and some of the top ten distrowatch linux os:
http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major
some of the lightweight distributions:
Lightweight Linux distribution
The idea here is to compare porteus to other os in terms of booting and closing time for know (listing the basic software provided by these os would be interesting). This information would be used on wikipedia to present the system. We want to establish our reputation: simple, fast and effective. Lets prove the fast feature.
The comparison could be made in terms of the kde desktop or in terms of the lxde desktop depending on the type os: main distribution or lightweight.
Testing on recent boxes could be a good thing, but also on some machines that are not so recent. Mentioning the specs of these machines would be necessary.
1) I would like that we agree on two or three main systems to be compared with porteus and a few lightweights.
2) that we have a set of recent and older machines on which to test porteus for which we could provide specs like ram, processor, wifi and graphic card for example. What should we ask as for specs?
3) agree for the median of three runs of booting and closing on each system.
But first, what do you think of the idea^
windows and some of the top ten distrowatch linux os:
http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major
some of the lightweight distributions:
Lightweight Linux distribution
The idea here is to compare porteus to other os in terms of booting and closing time for know (listing the basic software provided by these os would be interesting). This information would be used on wikipedia to present the system. We want to establish our reputation: simple, fast and effective. Lets prove the fast feature.
The comparison could be made in terms of the kde desktop or in terms of the lxde desktop depending on the type os: main distribution or lightweight.
Testing on recent boxes could be a good thing, but also on some machines that are not so recent. Mentioning the specs of these machines would be necessary.
1) I would like that we agree on two or three main systems to be compared with porteus and a few lightweights.
2) that we have a set of recent and older machines on which to test porteus for which we could provide specs like ram, processor, wifi and graphic card for example. What should we ask as for specs?
3) agree for the median of three runs of booting and closing on each system.
But first, what do you think of the idea^