replace kwrite by medit in x86_64

New features which should be implemented in Porteus; suggestions are welcome. All questions or problems with testing releases (alpha, beta, or rc) should go in their relevant thread here, rather than the Bug Reports section.
User avatar
KSA_ARAB
Black ninja
Black ninja
Posts: 52
Joined: 29 Dec 2010, 00:54
Location: Saudi Arabia
Contact:

replace kwrite by medit in x86_64

Post#1 by KSA_ARAB » 17 Jan 2011, 06:38

since I had small memory of RAM I was using 'kwrite' in kde4 because I need to open each text file in septate window.. but I installed 'medit' it's gtk text editor , .I felt it light and I can open many text files with multi-tabs ,
  • *Features
    Configurable syntax highlighting.
    Configurable keyboard accelerators.
    Multiplatform - works both on unix and windows.
    Plugins: can be written in C or Python.
    Configurable tools available from the main and context menus. They can be written in Python or Lua, or it can be a shell script.
    Regular expression search/replace, grep and find frontends, builtin file selector, etc.
    browse files to open your files.
    open terminal in same window.
    See screenshots.
Image

I thought maybe good idea to next porteus release .
delete => libkate + kwrite , ... , and install => medit

ok. it's up to you,
any suggestions !!
thanks

User avatar
fanthom
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 5667
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 02:42
Distribution: Porteus Kiosk
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: replace kwrite by medit in x86_64

Post#2 by fanthom » 17 Jan 2011, 14:27

thanks for suggestion, but i'll rather stay with kwrite.
please add 'medit' to your repo (when possible) so users will be able to have a look on it.

BTW - we dont have 'libkate' in 64bit build.
Please add [Solved] to your thread title if the solution was found.

User avatar
Hool de Nord
White ninja
White ninja
Posts: 13
Joined: 06 Jan 2011, 15:00
Distribution: -
Location: Poland

Re: replace kwrite by medit in x86_64

Post#3 by Hool de Nord » 20 Jan 2011, 18:28


Post Reply