btop

Post links to your 64bit module repos here. Repo maintainers are responsible for resolving any issues caused by their xzm's.
User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Location: Forests of Germany

btop

Post#16 by Rava » 19 Dec 2021, 07:24

Ed_P wrote:
19 Dec 2021, 06:33
It is too bad this approach can't be used with https://www.mediafire.com/ downloads. :x
As far as I understand it, mf wants you to visit their site to make money with the ads they display.
That I use a very efficient add-blocker (uBlock Origin) and that mf never complained about it makes it obvious that their approach is flawed at best.
Then again, mf is flawed by how they code their site anyway. :D You of all people should recall mf flaws.
(I recall your failed attempt at uploading a certain module (with DE specific dependencies for a program module by yours truly - when I recall that correctly) to mf - that ended in you not being able to, at least not using mf doing so)
Cheers!
Yours Rava

User avatar
Ed_P
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 8360
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
Location: Western NY, USA

btop

Post#17 by Ed_P » 19 Dec 2021, 17:12

Rava wrote:
19 Dec 2021, 07:24
mf wants you to visit their site to make money with the ads they display.
Yup :happy62: Most/all websites do.
Rava wrote:
19 Dec 2021, 07:24
I use a very efficient add-blocker (uBlock Origin)
I use StopAll Ads and mf does get by it.
Rava wrote:
19 Dec 2021, 07:24
You of all people should recall mf flaws.
:o I don't recall what I had for breakfast! :lol:
Ed

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Location: Forests of Germany

btop

Post#18 by Rava » 20 Dec 2021, 04:30

Ed_P wrote:
19 Dec 2021, 17:12
I use StopAll Ads and mf does get by it.
I use uBlock Origin and almost no site gets past it. :D
___________________________________________

just for the lurkers:
while the modification time of the x86-64-Port5.0rc3 file of /usr/share/porteus/porteus-functions differs from the i586-Port4.0 one, the size and md5sum

Code: Select all

size 9646 bytes
md5sum 79495358bd1116448a7df4f0fdea7178
are identical, meaning it contens is, too.

@ncmprhnsbl
Off topic. While examining /usr/share/porteus/porteus-functions I wondered about is_saving_changes()
Cheers!
Yours Rava

User avatar
ncmprhnsbl
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3933
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 03:42
Distribution: v5.0-64bit
Location: australia
Contact:

btop

Post#19 by ncmprhnsbl » 21 Dec 2021, 03:24

Rava wrote:
20 Dec 2021, 04:30
Off topic. While examining /usr/share/porteus/porteus-functions I wondered about is_saving_changes()
an artifact from a previous era, i presume.. incidentally something that lives on in nemesis..
should probly fix it for the current /etc/bootcmd.cfg
chances are that nothing actually uses this function
Forum Rules : https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=44

Post Reply