Page 2 of 2

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 07 Apr 2016, 21:41
by ztrapl
Jack wrote:
MasterPDFEditor-3.6.30-x86_64 - Office[/quote
Where is the link at? The only link is for a older version.
Still applies that all modules are here : https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ :)

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 08 Apr 2016, 06:12
by amplatfus
Jack wrote:
MasterPDFEditor-3.6.30-x86_64 - Office[/quote
Where is the link at? The only link is for a older version.
Thanks to the mate who upload it, here you can find it: https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ/Office

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 08 Apr 2016, 14:07
by amplatfus
@ztrapl Please, any chance to have last version Google Chrome compiled as *.xzm for 64bits?
PS: sorry for my upper post from 08 Apr 2016, 08:12. I didn't read the thread before post. My fault!
All the best!

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 08 Apr 2016, 19:44
by ztrapl
amplatfus wrote:@ztrapl Please, any chance to have last version Google Chrome compiled as *.xzm for 64bits?
PS: sorry for my upper post from 08 Apr 2016, 08:12. I didn't read the thread before post. My fault!
All the best!
OK. Here is the google-chrome-49.0.2623.112-stable-x64-1.xzm :)
Download : https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ - folder Internet
Enjoy 8)

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 07:21
by amplatfus
ztrapl wrote:
amplatfus wrote:@ztrapl Please, any chance to have last version Google Chrome compiled as *.xzm for 64bits?
PS: sorry for my upper post from 08 Apr 2016, 08:12. I didn't read the thread before post. My fault!
All the best!
OK. Here is the google-chrome-49.0.2623.112-stable-x64-1.xzm :)
Download : https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ - folder Internet
Enjoy 8)
Thanks again. I have a issue with this module. I was using before the "--user-data-dir %U" flag to run chrome from root and all worked fine.
Now it stop (terminal freeze) with the following error. This module works if I am logged on guest.

Code: Select all

root@porteus:~# /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome --user-data-dir %U
[4632:4632:0409/100524:ERROR:nacl_fork_delegate_linux.cc(315)] Bad NaCl helper startup ack (0 bytes)
When I run this module from older chrome with the same flag all works fine.
Please, it depends on chrome update "internally" / or is about my LXDE Porteus or we can do something to run with this flag further on?

Many thanks,
amplatfus

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 07:31
by amplatfus
amplatfus wrote:
ztrapl wrote:
amplatfus wrote:@ztrapl Please, any chance to have last version Google Chrome compiled as *.xzm for 64bits?
PS: sorry for my upper post from 08 Apr 2016, 08:12. I didn't read the thread before post. My fault!
All the best!
OK. Here is the google-chrome-49.0.2623.112-stable-x64-1.xzm :)
Download : https://yadi.sk/d/lf9fSI_3hUADZ - folder Internet
Enjoy 8)
Thanks again. I have a issue with this module. I was using before the "--user-data-dir %U" flag to run chrome from root and all worked fine.
Now it stop (terminal freeze) with the following error. This module works if I am logged on guest.

Code: Select all

root@porteus:~# /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome --user-data-dir %U
[4632:4632:0409/100524:ERROR:nacl_fork_delegate_linux.cc(315)] Bad NaCl helper startup ack (0 bytes)
When I run with the same flag on older chrome module all works fine.
Please, it depends on chrome update "internally" / or is about my LXDE Porteus or we can do something to run with this flag further on?

Many thanks,
amplatfus

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 10:21
by ztrapl
@amplatfus

Code: Select all

google-chrome-stable --user-data-dir %U --no-sandbox

[SOLVED] Chrome under root with flags

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 10:35
by amplatfus
ztrapl wrote:@amplatfus

Code: Select all

google-chrome-stable --user-data-dir %U --no-sandbox
worked. Thanks!

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 10:44
by ztrapl
amplatfus wrote:
ztrapl wrote:@amplatfus

Code: Select all

google-chrome-stable --user-data-dir %U --no-sandbox
worked. Thanks!
You can also use this command:

Code: Select all

/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome --no-sandbox --user-data-dir
Enjoy 8)

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 13:15
by amplatfus
ztrapl wrote: You can also use this command:

Code: Select all

/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome --no-sandbox --user-data-dir
Enjoy 8)
I found out this executabile script.sh in order to run chrome from root under guest terminal:

Code: Select all

sudo su guest << BASH
  /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome;
BASH
So running under guest works without flags (--user-data-dir %U --no-sandbox) but without access to root folders.
BR.

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 15:43
by francois
@amplatfus:
Running google-chrome without sandbox is really not reccomended, though I like very much the idea. Personally, in root mode I work with firefox or work from root google-chrome in guest mode:
su -c chromium guest

Code: Select all

su -c /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome
You can get google-chrome to start from the kde menu editor by changing the command assorted with google-chrome. Right click on the big K.

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 16:14
by ztrapl
francois wrote:@amplatfus:
Running google-chrome without sandbox is really not reccomended, though I like very much the idea. Personally, in root mode I work with firefox or work from root google-chrome in guest mode:

Code: Select all

su -c chromium guest
You can get google-chrome to start from the kde menu editor by changing the command assorted with google-chrome. Right click on the big K.
@francois
These two commands are working correctly.
But which is better to use ?

Code: Select all

su guest /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome

Code: Select all

su -c /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome  guest

Re: Modules for Porteus 3.x.x KDE4 x86_64

Posted: 09 Apr 2016, 17:32
by francois
@ztrapl:
It seems that both are good, but I did not examined them in detail. And you were right and I was wrong, you need to put the full path to the command, and in this peculiar case use google-chrome instead of chromium (I have corrected my mistake in the precedent post).