Fluxbox vs Openbox
Posted: 15 Dec 2019, 09:55
MX Linux just launched Fluxbox edition.
Before a major screw-up from my part, I've been using Manjaro Openbox and was very satisfied. I ended with a very functional and polished system with some minors additions/deletions here and there.
Now, I'm back at XFCE on main desktop, and thanks to Porteus, this forum (and some AppImages) I have been able to complete an almost identical (portable) setup, whether in Slackware, Arch or Debian.
Also, It should be noted that XFCE has now reached a very mature GTK3 state and performs as solid and stable as ever (maybe a little heavier if you wish). What would I gain/lose in adding one of those WM instead xfwm? I don't like having redundant/duplicate things installed. (Thinking of xfce4-appfinder / whiskermenu plugin / rofi as semantic launcher)
In your experience, what are the biggest differences you've found when using one or the other as a WM ?
Cheers!
Before a major screw-up from my part, I've been using Manjaro Openbox and was very satisfied. I ended with a very functional and polished system with some minors additions/deletions here and there.
Now, I'm back at XFCE on main desktop, and thanks to Porteus, this forum (and some AppImages) I have been able to complete an almost identical (portable) setup, whether in Slackware, Arch or Debian.
Also, It should be noted that XFCE has now reached a very mature GTK3 state and performs as solid and stable as ever (maybe a little heavier if you wish). What would I gain/lose in adding one of those WM instead xfwm? I don't like having redundant/duplicate things installed. (Thinking of xfce4-appfinder / whiskermenu plugin / rofi as semantic launcher)
In your experience, what are the biggest differences you've found when using one or the other as a WM ?
Cheers!