Salutations...
In 001-core.xzm what binaries depend on elf?
(Pls Note: This is not an issue for 02-xorg because the answer can be found using USM in text mode.)
Best Regards...
Dependency for... aaa_elflibs-14.1-x86_64-1ftm
Re: Dependency for... aaa_elflibs-14.1-x86_64-1ftm
hi,
aaa_elflibs: aaa_elflibs (shared libraries needed by many programs)
aaa_elflibs:
aaa_elflibs: This is a collection of shared libraries needed to run Linux programs.
aaa_elflibs: ELF (Executable and Linking Format) is the standard Linux binary
aaa_elflibs: format. These libraries are gathered from other Slackware packages
aaa_elflibs: and are intended to give a fairly complete initial set of libraries.
aaa_elflibs: This package should be not upgraded or reinstalled (it could copy
aaa_elflibs: over newer library versions).
aaa_elflibs:
aaa_elflibs:
aaa_elflibs:
aaa_elflibs: aaa_elflibs (shared libraries needed by many programs)
aaa_elflibs:
aaa_elflibs: This is a collection of shared libraries needed to run Linux programs.
aaa_elflibs: ELF (Executable and Linking Format) is the standard Linux binary
aaa_elflibs: format. These libraries are gathered from other Slackware packages
aaa_elflibs: and are intended to give a fairly complete initial set of libraries.
aaa_elflibs: This package should be not upgraded or reinstalled (it could copy
aaa_elflibs: over newer library versions).
aaa_elflibs:
aaa_elflibs:
aaa_elflibs:
Re: Dependency for... aaa_elflibs-14.1-x86_64-1ftm
Salutations...
The package log is a given...
I'm referring to the 001-core binaries that this was intended to support.
Otherwise it would have been placed in 002-xorg.
There appears to be a specific binary target(s) behind the decision to use this.
I'm trying to deprecate it without breaking 001-core.
Perhaps... the intended support is for...
libacl... libattr... libz2... libcap... libdb... libdevmapper... libdm... libfuse... libgbm... liblzma... libcurses... libcursesw... libpopt... libsysfs... libtermcap... libz...???
Best Regards...
The package log is a given...
I'm referring to the 001-core binaries that this was intended to support.
Otherwise it would have been placed in 002-xorg.
There appears to be a specific binary target(s) behind the decision to use this.
I'm trying to deprecate it without breaking 001-core.
Perhaps... the intended support is for...
libacl... libattr... libz2... libcap... libdb... libdevmapper... libdm... libfuse... libgbm... liblzma... libcurses... libcursesw... libpopt... libsysfs... libtermcap... libz...???
Best Regards...