You mean bloated, almost as slow as SM-Witless OS?
Will do, I can use some good time, I had a very rough day.
Reading it now; one user only commented on how you can use the P for kiosk, but should the kiosk branch of Port not be a different OS, and have its separate user reply place on https://distrowatch.com
Maybe it is so and the user picked the wrong entry, but maybe there is no entry for port Kiosk. like I knew in advance that the Wikipedia editors will reject the notion of having Port Kiosk as a stand alone wiki entry. I knew because there have been some blockheads who claimed Port is too insignificant to have a Wikipedia entry at all - to that another wiki editor replied with listing Windoze 1.x and 2.x versions all as single wiki pages, when these OS are of no interest to anyone nowadays. To that the nagging wiki editor had no reply.
And Francois, you sure have been correct of how fine some reviews are, like this one goes down like the finest vine:
Fun fact, this is exactly what most o0f us aim for, so good a user sees just that in Port. <BWhenever I install something on any other OS, I always get this nagging feeling, what if this breaks my system?
Not so on porteus. Install something as a module, put in the the modules folder, if it breaks, just delete the module. The rest of the system and modules are magically restored!
Same with the live system. I can run any command on the live system, without any worries of what if this hoses my system?
I know systems like puppy does it too. But Porteus is the only system that is as minimal as puppy or tiny core, but provides much more functionality and looks great too!
Great concept on a great OS. Keep up the good work!