PorteuX - The Next Experience
-
- Samurai
- Posts: 122
- Joined: 10 Aug 2016, 05:36
- Distribution: Porteux V-0.1 64 KDE
- Location: Utopia in Tampa, Florida, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Yes but a very long time ago. I have made a few PEs from my XP PRO disk but then Win 7 came along and I was wowed. Then I found Linux and all that implies.
Lately I only dabble in Windows land and am called upon now and again to try to rescue some desperate friend or relative.
Is there something cool you know that most do not?
Thanks for your help and interest in my project.
Vic
Lately I only dabble in Windows land and am called upon now and again to try to rescue some desperate friend or relative.
Is there something cool you know that most do not?
Thanks for your help and interest in my project.
Vic
-
- Samurai
- Posts: 122
- Joined: 10 Aug 2016, 05:36
- Distribution: Porteux V-0.1 64 KDE
- Location: Utopia in Tampa, Florida, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Is there a possibility for a dedicated section for Porteux? I checked but did not find one.
I can see this thread getting too big for it's britches. I know that I will have more questions as time goes by.
Thanks Fulalas.
Vic
I can see this thread getting too big for it's britches. I know that I will have more questions as time goes by.
Thanks Fulalas.
Vic
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Well, I guess it could be moved to here: Porteus derivatives but then people might not see it.
Ed
-
- Samurai
- Posts: 122
- Joined: 10 Aug 2016, 05:36
- Distribution: Porteux V-0.1 64 KDE
- Location: Utopia in Tampa, Florida, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Hi Ed.
If I start a new topic concerning Porteux where would you recommend it go?
Vic
If I start a new topic concerning Porteux where would you recommend it go?
Vic
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Hi Vic,
If you want it to be seen by people signing on write the new topic in this section and put PorteuX in the title.
Bart's forum is where I learned to create bootable CDs and then bootable ISOs. I still have that pc where I multi-boot XP and 7.
Added in 1 hour 49 seconds:
BTW Vic, with the PorteuX files copied to a USB drive it Fails to Execute the Login Command when I try to boot it.
If you want it to be seen by people signing on write the new topic in this section and put PorteuX in the title.
Bart's forum is where I learned to create bootable CDs and then bootable ISOs. I still have that pc where I multi-boot XP and 7.
Added in 1 hour 49 seconds:
BTW Vic, with the PorteuX files copied to a USB drive it Fails to Execute the Login Command when I try to boot it.
Ed
-
- Samurai
- Posts: 122
- Joined: 10 Aug 2016, 05:36
- Distribution: Porteux V-0.1 64 KDE
- Location: Utopia in Tampa, Florida, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Hi Ed.
Bart's forum and Knoppix were my first experience. I was wowed.
So far I have only placed the files on a FAT32 partition and an EXT4 partition. USB still to be tested.
Thanks for your input.
Vic
Bart's forum and Knoppix were my first experience. I was wowed.
So far I have only placed the files on a FAT32 partition and an EXT4 partition. USB still to be tested.
Thanks for your input.
Vic
-
- DEV Team
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
- Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
- Location: japan
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Porteus has lower drawing performance than APortues.
Would you tell me the performance of PorteusX
that will be measured by "hardinfo" command "Benchmarks --> GPU Drawing".
[My PC environment results]
1. 64 bit XFCE Desktop: PorteusV5.0-MULT_ja-23.02.16-x86_64.iso
Japanese locale modules for Porteus (Post by neko #59353)
-GPU Drawing-
* Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4120 CPU @ 1.10GHz 4x 2600.00 MHz 3050.98
2. 64 bit XFCE Desktop: APorteus-XFCE_ja-v23.03.08-x86_64.iso
ArchLinux packages manager for Porteus (Post by neko #36689)
-GPU Drawing-
* Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4120 CPU @ 1.10GHz 4x 2600.00 MHz 11987.03
Thanks.
Would you tell me the performance of PorteusX
that will be measured by "hardinfo" command "Benchmarks --> GPU Drawing".
[My PC environment results]
1. 64 bit XFCE Desktop: PorteusV5.0-MULT_ja-23.02.16-x86_64.iso
Japanese locale modules for Porteus (Post by neko #59353)
-GPU Drawing-
* Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4120 CPU @ 1.10GHz 4x 2600.00 MHz 3050.98
2. 64 bit XFCE Desktop: APorteus-XFCE_ja-v23.03.08-x86_64.iso
ArchLinux packages manager for Porteus (Post by neko #36689)
-GPU Drawing-
* Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4120 CPU @ 1.10GHz 4x 2600.00 MHz 11987.03
Thanks.
- Blaze
- DEV Team
- Posts: 3885
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 11:31
- Distribution: ⟰ Porteus current ☯ all DEs ☯
- Location: ☭ Russian Federation, Lipetsk region, Dankov
- Contact:
PorteuX - The Next Experience
I have only these benchmarks
Linux 6.6.11-porteus #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 14 12:07:37 MSK 2024 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
MS-7A12 » [AMD/ATI] Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600] [1002:73ff] (rev c7) » Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 K2 3200MHz C16
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
I don't have any.
Code: Select all
root@porteus:/home/guest# Tectbl
bash: Tectbl: command not found
root@porteus:/home/guest#
Ed
-
- DEV Team
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 09:55
- Distribution: APorteus-FVWM-ja-x86_64.iso
- Location: japan
"hardinfo" in PorteuX
@Blaze, @Ed_P
If applications of Porteus V5.0 abailable be used in PorteuX,
you can use use "hardinfo" in PorteuX
by porting "004-hardinfo.xzm & 004-hardinfo64-patch.xzm"
from PorteusV5.0-MULT_ja-23.02.16-x86_64.iso to PorteuX.
PorteusV5.0-MULT_ja-23.02.16-x86_64.iso
Japanese locale modules for Porteus (Post by neko #59353)
Thanks.
Note:
I can not post in PorteuX thread.
If applications of Porteus V5.0 abailable be used in PorteuX,
you can use use "hardinfo" in PorteuX
by porting "004-hardinfo.xzm & 004-hardinfo64-patch.xzm"
from PorteusV5.0-MULT_ja-23.02.16-x86_64.iso to PorteuX.
PorteusV5.0-MULT_ja-23.02.16-x86_64.iso
Japanese locale modules for Porteus (Post by neko #59353)
Thanks.
Note:
I can not post in PorteuX thread.
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
"hardinfo" in PorteuX
Thanks neko, the System Information GUI looks promising but I think it may need work.
Code: Select all
guest@porteus:~$ hardinfo
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.236: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "adwaita",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.236: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.237: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.237: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.237: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.237: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.237: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.237: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.237: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.237: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.238: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap",
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:45:51.239: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "adwaita",
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
(hardinfo:2189): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: 20:49:12.003: invalid cast from 'GtkVBox' to 'GtkButtonBox'
(hardinfo:2189): Gtk-CRITICAL **: 20:49:12.003: IA__gtk_button_box_set_layout: assertion 'GTK_IS_BUTTON_BOX (widget)' failed
Any reason why shown?
Ed
PorteuX - The Next Experience
@Blaze, try this module here: https://www.mediafire.com/file/7ih31cg0 ... 6_64-1.xzm
@neko, it's interesting because on my machine the results are the opposite. Take a look:
Xfce (no compositor):
aporteus xfce 4.18 -> 9,728.52
porteus 5 xfce 4.16 -> 30,953.96
porteux 0.1 xfce 4.12 -> 31,766.83
porteux 0.1 xfce 4.16 -> 31,202.01
porteux 0.1 xfce 4.18 -> 31,010.10
Gnome (compositor):
fedora 37 gnome 43 -> 2,574.30
porteux 0.1 gnome 42 -> 7,069.33
ubuntu 22.04 gnome 42 -> 6,387.72
Gnome (compositor / nvidia driver):
pop_os 22.04 gnome 42 -> 21,551.85
porteux 0.1 gnome 42 -> 27,759.73
Bonus (nvidia driver):
porteux 0.1 xfce 4.12 -> 55,138.77
Porteus and PorteuX have basically the same performance and they beat everybody else
@neko, it's interesting because on my machine the results are the opposite. Take a look:
Xfce (no compositor):
aporteus xfce 4.18 -> 9,728.52
porteus 5 xfce 4.16 -> 30,953.96
porteux 0.1 xfce 4.12 -> 31,766.83
porteux 0.1 xfce 4.16 -> 31,202.01
porteux 0.1 xfce 4.18 -> 31,010.10
Gnome (compositor):
fedora 37 gnome 43 -> 2,574.30
porteux 0.1 gnome 42 -> 7,069.33
ubuntu 22.04 gnome 42 -> 6,387.72
Gnome (compositor / nvidia driver):
pop_os 22.04 gnome 42 -> 21,551.85
porteux 0.1 gnome 42 -> 27,759.73
Bonus (nvidia driver):
porteux 0.1 xfce 4.12 -> 55,138.77
Porteus and PorteuX have basically the same performance and they beat everybody else
Last edited by Ed_P on 13 Mar 2023, 04:37, edited 1 time in total.
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Thanks fulalas.fulalas wrote: ↑13 Mar 2023, 04:29try this module here: https://www.mediafire.com/file/7ih31cg0 ... 6_64-1.xzm
Code: Select all
guest@porteus:~$ hardinfo
hardinfo: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
guest@porteus:~$
Ed
PorteuX - The Next Experience
@Ed_P, GTK2 is missing. You can download it from the bundles or Slackware repository.
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
PorteuX - The Next Experience
Thanks fulalas. Actually I have a gtk+2-2.24.32-x86_64-3.xzm in my optional folder which worked when I activated it.
Code: Select all
guest@porteus:~$ hardinfo
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 1024 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 1024 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 1024 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 1024 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 1024 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 1024 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 1024 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 1024 bytes while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
Ed