It seems that some porteus 4.0 modules work out of the box for nemesis. Here are a few:
- web browsers in general: chromium, firefox, palemoon etc.
- libreoffice
Please let us know of your experience.
Thanks.
using porteus 4.0 modules for nemesis
Moderator: M. Eerie
- francois
- Contributor
- Posts: 6435
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 14:25
- Distribution: xfce plank porteus nemesis
- Location: Le printemps, le printemps, le printemps... ... l'hiver s'essoufle.
using porteus 4.0 modules for nemesis
Prendre son temps, profiter de celui qui passe.
- Rava
- Contributor
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
- Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
- Location: Forests of Germany
2020 Updated Nemesis Base Modules
when one wants to stick with xfce4 4.12, which module would work?
Would e.g.
do?fulalas wrote: ↑26 Dec 2020, 06:10I'm playing around with aggressive compiler flags now. I've just built 4.12 from scratch using these flags. It's very experimental (and it doesn't come with whiskermenu nor poppler-data), but if you want to give it a try, here it goes: https://www.mediafire.com/file/jw4v7z30 ... 201225.xzm
Cheers!
Yours Rava
Yours Rava
- ncmprhnsbl
- DEV Team
- Posts: 3936
- Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 03:42
- Distribution: v5.0-64bit
- Location: australia
- Contact:
using porteus 4.0 modules for nemesis
moved this question to a slightly more relevent topic..
one of the main differences between slackware and arch/artix is that /usr/lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib, so any slackware compiled libs would overwrite that, which may or may not be a problem.. for something..
another is whether dependent libs present in nemesis are version compatible with what is required by the slackware(what version?) compiled packages..
there would be i imagine, some things missing: eg. gvfs and udisks are in porteus 002-xorg, in nemesis they're in 003
short answer: idk, let us know how it goes
perhaps.. depends on a few factors..
one of the main differences between slackware and arch/artix is that /usr/lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib, so any slackware compiled libs would overwrite that, which may or may not be a problem.. for something..
another is whether dependent libs present in nemesis are version compatible with what is required by the slackware(what version?) compiled packages..
there would be i imagine, some things missing: eg. gvfs and udisks are in porteus 002-xorg, in nemesis they're in 003
short answer: idk, let us know how it goes
Forum Rules : https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=44