Please reproduce your error on a second machine before posting, and check the error by running without saved changes or extra modules (See FAQ No. 13, "How to report a bug"). For unstable Porteus versions (alpha, beta, rc) please use the relevant thread in our "Development" section.
If I use LO from official website https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/ (LibreOffice as rpm packages from official web site does not require boost dep) - I can't able to run libreoffice6.1 --impress but I can save .doc or .docx formats in the official LO
The same story for the libreoffice 6.1.4 - I can't able to run
hi blaze seem a java issue try to do a package of jdk with usm or sbo, and try again, maybe you have yet,i have upgraded to the last libreoffice and work, the load of package for me is 220mb but you know is only a repack of rpm software.
Why Java Vulnerabilities Are One of Your Biggest Security Problems
This software used by millions is one of the key targets for cyber criminals
Emphasis by me.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/2030778 ... -soon.html
Why resolve security issues? Why did the Linux community solve the silly bash bugs in the last few years when according to you, every OS has security issues and especially java (and MS Windoze) are among the programs / OS that took their longest time to solve security issues. Some issues are not fixed after being known for years.
And, it has been 5 1/2 yrs since this was published.
The point being OSs and apps have faults. Always have always will, and Java is no different that any others, it has bugs and it issues fixes for them so no need to ban the app frivolously. For a list of fixes check this link: https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java ... 25394.html
This document may contain formatting or content that cannot be saved in the currently selected file format “Word 97–2003”.
Use the default ODF file format to be sure that the document is saved correctly.
Why did the Linux community solve the silly bash bugs in the last few years
If you think Linux is safe then there is no need for these Linux scanners you requested. Vulnerability scanners
You realize that using some of these scanners is not solely done to test your own system but to test other e.g. clients system using your (=e.g. Porteus Linux) system as host system running these scanners.
Also, please look in which sub-forum I posted that, it was deliberately NOT posted in "modules request" sub-forum but in… Intermediate/Advanced User Questions
Did you miss that on purpose? Or why do you call my questions a "request for (someone else making a module)" when it was never about that?
Do I have to explain to you the difference between requesting a module and asking which scanners should be included in a module I plan to do when I have still the time(and when brokenman wrote his "wishlist" for scanners to be included) cause you seem not to get the very vast difference by yourself.