Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Please reproduce your error on a second machine before posting, and check the error by running without saved changes or extra modules (See FAQ No. 13, "How to report a bug"). For unstable Porteus versions (alpha, beta, rc) please use the relevant thread in our "Development" section.
User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#136 by Rava » 20 Sep 2022, 08:21

^
for now just try a different mirror (but not http://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/porteus since that lacks the updates ) - better a slightly slower download than a broken and useless one, yes?
Cheers!
Yours Rava

User avatar
ncmprhnsbl
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3924
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 03:42
Distribution: v5.0-64bit
Location: australia
Contact:

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#137 by ncmprhnsbl » 20 Sep 2022, 10:16

nanZor wrote:
20 Sep 2022, 08:17
Yep - you nailed it. The md5 for 001 on riken.jp is wrong.
Rava wrote:
20 Sep 2022, 08:21
or now just try a different mirror
actually, this time it's not a mirror issue, but my bad, i apparently messed up with that particular md5sum. a fix is in the works...
Forum Rules : https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=44

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#138 by Rava » 20 Sep 2022, 10:21

ncmprhnsbl wrote:
20 Sep 2022, 10:16
i apparently messed up with that particular md5sum. a fix is in the works...
Does that mean the two files are downloaded - one is not okay?
Or are both okay and only the server md5sum file is wrong?
Cheers!
Yours Rava

User avatar
ncmprhnsbl
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3924
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 03:42
Distribution: v5.0-64bit
Location: australia
Contact:

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#139 by ncmprhnsbl » 20 Sep 2022, 22:53

both okay and only the server md5sum file was wrong.
Forum Rules : https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=44

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#140 by Rava » 21 Sep 2022, 13:19

ncmprhnsbl wrote:
20 Sep 2022, 22:53
both okay and only the server md5sum file was wrong.
It would have been too much of an coincidence if I got a corrupted module but still both worked well for me for many weeks now.

Anyhow, any idea why the server I choose (because fastest-mirror told me its the fastest) http://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/porteus did have the relatively new yt-dlp module… but not the two updated 001-core.xzm and 002-xorg.xzm modules?
Is it something the server admins of ftp.nluug.nl should be told about?
Cheers!
Yours Rava

nanZor
Shogun
Shogun
Posts: 381
Joined: 09 Apr 2019, 03:27
Distribution: Porteus 5.01 x86-64 LXQT

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#141 by nanZor » 22 Sep 2022, 21:09

Savefile Manager brings up empty config file

[UPDATE} This problem does not happen with the original 001 etc modules. It appears to be a problem with the latest updates that it is showing up.

Just noticed this with XFCE (haven't tested the others for this yet). If using the savefile manager gui, at the end of the process to edit the config file, instead of bringing up the config file, it just brings up an empty file with root access.

That might be confusing. Normally I do my editing with vi and a terminal, but the gui process used to bring up the file itself for the user to edit. Now it is just a blank empty one.

The quick solution is to bail out of the savefile manager when it asks you to edit the config file, and go to the Porteus Settings Centre to do it, which *does* bring up the proper config file to edit.

I could see this empty file being confusing for new users who don't know where the config file lives.

Anyone else see this?
[Update] does not happen with the original xzm core etc. Only seems to be with the 20220723 updates...
That's a UNIX book - cool. -Garth

User avatar
Ed_P
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 8341
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
Location: Western NY, USA

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#142 by Ed_P » 22 Sep 2022, 21:51

Good catches guys. :good:
Ed

User avatar
ncmprhnsbl
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 3924
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 03:42
Distribution: v5.0-64bit
Location: australia
Contact:

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#143 by ncmprhnsbl » 23 Sep 2022, 00:03

nanZor wrote:
22 Sep 2022, 21:09
Anyone else see this?
[Update] does not happen with the original xzm core etc. Only seems to be with the 20220723 updates...
yes, in this update, i reverted to the old gtkdialog version(with some tweaks) and it doesn't pick up the environment variable for the boot device.. should be able to fix this and push it in the next update..

while i'm here: bug reported via irc: the magic folders gui doesn't function due to incomplete code .. also should be fixed in the next update. (probly, i'll just clean up the old gtkdialog version for now)
Forum Rules : https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=44

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#144 by Rava » 29 Sep 2022, 03:37

System Port 5.0 XFCE

Code: Select all

root@porteus:~# cat /etc/porteus/*
001-core.xzm:20220723
002-xorg.xzm:20220723
002-xtra.xzm:20220630
003-xfce4.xzm:20220428
initrd.xz:20201102
Cave! the XFCE info is misleading. XFCE is in fact 003-xfce-4.12-20220725

I presume this is not what should happen (as seen after a fresh boot due to yet another crash during suspend):

Code: Select all

root@porteus:~# fastest-mirror 
Checking fastest mirror ...

Results:


 Would you like to add  as your main Porteus server? [y/n]
I presume it was a rare occasion with my network at the time that created the situation:
I was on a open WLAN, and at times my machine is technically still connected to that WLAN, but anything HTTPS, SMTP or IMAP is not working (giving different kinds of error messages) since I need to reaffirm my approval to its terms & conditions.
The only page that works with https is the one by the provider of that WLAN for loading its terms & conditions approval page.
Cheers!
Yours Rava

Testuser
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 137
Joined: 26 May 2021, 15:11
Distribution: Porteus-v5.0-64-LXDE

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#145 by Testuser » 01 Oct 2022, 06:08

Team,

In LXDE env, USB notifications are not shown for mounting and unmounting of USB drives.

Udisks2 and gvfs volume monitor are already there.

Since notification-daemon was not there by default I have added it as well and able to see other notifications.

Any idea to fix it :Search: :%)

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#146 by Rava » 01 Oct 2022, 06:18

^
create notification-daemon as module and place it in your porteus/base folder of your LXDE setup. :)
(I have not set up a LXDE - but when that fixes the issue [and I presume it would since it fixed the issue for you] notification-daemon should be added to 003-lxde .
My XFCE based Port 5.0 doesn't have notification-daemon - since XFCE does it differently:

Code: Select all

guest@porteus:/mnt/live/memory/images$ find . 2>/dev/null |grep notification-daemon
guest@porteus:/mnt/live/memory/images$ 
The 2>/dev/null is added to get rid of messages like this

Code: Select all

find: ‘./011-slapt-get-0.11.6-x86_64-2gv.xzm/var/lib/pkgtools/setup/tmp’: Permission denied
Cheers!
Yours Rava

Testuser
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 137
Joined: 26 May 2021, 15:11
Distribution: Porteus-v5.0-64-LXDE

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#147 by Testuser » 01 Oct 2022, 09:24

Rava wrote:
01 Oct 2022, 06:18
^
create notification-daemon as module and place it in your porteus/base folder of your LXDE setup. :)
I have notification-daemon added in my Changes folder and other notifications are working as expected. Is it mandatory to move the notification module to base folder :o

Just want to know if an older version of gvfs-udisk2-monitor is used in LXDE or what?

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/-/b ... ks2utils.c

In the above page, "Device can be unplugged" is embedded in the code of gvfs.

So why showing in Cinnamon, gnome, mate and not showing in LXDE and LXQT :%) :crazy:

User avatar
Rava
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 02:46
Distribution: XFCE 5.01 x86_64 + 4.0 i586
Location: Forests of Germany

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#148 by Rava » 01 Oct 2022, 10:23

Testuser wrote:
01 Oct 2022, 09:24
Is it mandatory to move the notification module to base folder
No it is not.
I not use the changes folder. But even if I did, I still would move essential things I want to be always there into /base/ - just in case of updating it all some years in the future.
Then I see some individual programs (and maybe decide one or two I do no longer want or need) and will either keep the older modules for a newer Port version when they still work and I see no need for a never version.
Like in my case, I have some programs that are from Port 4.0 times or Port 5.0rc3 times, but they still work flawlessly in Port 5.0 and at times I prefer older versions since this means much less dependencies I also need to get these versions running as compared to at times a huge increase in dependency modules sizes for most recent versions.

Sorry that I cannot answer you the rest since currently I have no clue about the workings of LXDE or LXQT.

For me, XFCE is slim enough while having a more complete Desktop Environment feel (similar to KDE or mate) than the more minimal LXDE or LXQT or Openbox.
But that's just me. :)
Cheers!
Yours Rava

beny
Full of knowledge
Full of knowledge
Posts: 2086
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 11:33
Location: italy

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#149 by beny » 01 Oct 2022, 16:40

hi testuser, lxde notify you can add the dunst package,and for the lxqt you can use the lxqt-notificationd all the software are on slackware repository so you can download and make xzm,ps:all the desktop environment have the notify daemon built in,but not lxde so you can try if this work for you

Testuser
Samurai
Samurai
Posts: 137
Joined: 26 May 2021, 15:11
Distribution: Porteus-v5.0-64-LXDE

Porteus-v5.0x86_64_bugs reports

Post#150 by Testuser » 03 Oct 2022, 18:38

Beny,

Thanks much for the info and details.

I have tried lxqt-notificationd and xfce-notifyd in my DE. Noifications are working but gvfs USB notifications cannot be seen.

Tried gcd-print-notifications in my DE as well, but it didnt worked since showing org.freedesktop.Session error.

Now I am left with no choice for USB notifications in my DE. :%)

Thanks

Post Reply