Search found 1645 matches

by Rava
01 Apr 2011, 01:20
Forum: Development
Topic: new module hierarchy for 64bit default ISO
Replies: 13
Views: 2951

Re: new module hierarchy for 64bit default ISO

@fanthom I forgot to ask one thing... When creating the XFCe only Slax 6.1.2. I realized that the "popup" speech bubble that tells the user that a module is being loaded and later is being successfully loaded did not work without the KDE modules. I tried to extract the needed files but I did not suc...
by Rava
18 Mar 2011, 07:54
Forum: General chat
Topic: mousepad instead of leafpad for LXDE
Replies: 3
Views: 4056

Re: mousepad instead of leafpad for LXDE

Thanks Arabic_World, does anyone of these 2 use ~/.recently-used.xbel? I used geany, but it's long ago... Verfasst after 4 days 22 hours 22 minutes 4 seconds: Update @Arabic_World I created a Beaver 0.4.1 lzm, and it's running fine, but either I am too stupid and could not find the list in the menu ...
by Rava
15 Mar 2011, 02:00
Forum: Development
Topic: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)
Replies: 120
Views: 22168

Re: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)

I changed everything from 'lxde' to 'xfce', and 'lxdm' to 'startxfce4'. This disabled starting lxde, and I've been meaning to go back in and edit the script to allow all three to start up, but haven't found the time or the willpower. Do you have the XFCe 64 module already ready for Porteus 1.0? URL...
by Rava
14 Mar 2011, 19:57
Forum: Development
Topic: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)
Replies: 120
Views: 22168

Re: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)

Ahau wrote:Some edits to /etc/rc.d/rc4.d allowed me to get into xfce.
What edits have that been?
by Rava
14 Mar 2011, 14:55
Forum: Development
Topic: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)
Replies: 120
Views: 22168

Re: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)

It's okay Ahau...

But why is the forum acting weird? I cannot see your above quoted post unless I use the provided link... strange.
Ahau, are you kinda hidden at times in here? =@

Oh, and that is quite off topic in here.
by Rava
14 Mar 2011, 14:47
Forum: Development
Topic: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)
Replies: 120
Views: 22168

Re: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)

@fanthom I get it now. I wrote a script that changed the /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc symlink either to start KDE or LXDE. I think I will just put the wanted symlink in my 100-local. module then, just like with remix. :D Verfasst after 2 minutes 34 seconds: Ahau, I want telinit~3 for a reason, since I nee...
by Rava
13 Mar 2011, 09:35
Forum: Development
Topic: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)
Replies: 120
Views: 22168

Re: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)

@fanthom

Oh, that sounds like no fun with the deactivate/activate bug... :cry:
_______________________________

I included the file from Slax_remix that not loads the nouveau and X runs fine.

Just one issue left: I used the LDXE cheatcode, but still when running startx KDE is started. :(
by Rava
11 Mar 2011, 02:00
Forum: Development
Topic: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)
Replies: 120
Views: 22168

Re: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)

1) Okay... 2) 'lang=de_DE' wont work until you use 'LST' (which wont be updated before FINAL). you should be able to use locales module from older porteus (slax-remix) versions. conversion to xzm required. If X still gives me issues, is there a lzm2xzm for console in 1.0beta? 4) nvidia problems - pu...
by Rava
11 Mar 2011, 01:53
Forum: Development
Topic: new module hierarchy for 64bit default ISO
Replies: 13
Views: 2951

Re: new module hierarchy for 64bit default ISO

- move 'cdrtools' to 001-core (so new ISO could be created no matter of used modules) I fully agree here, it could be the core of an non X system with some basic functionality like creating isofs and burning CDROMs and DVDs... - move 'mplayer' + all required libs to 002-xorg (it would be available ...
by Rava
10 Mar 2011, 21:39
Forum: x86_64 xzm module requests
Topic: GIMP
Replies: 6
Views: 2185

Re: GIMP

I will check it out since I wanted to edit some stuff... as soon as I manage to get X and LXDE and the Nvidia driver and 1.0 beta working together. :Search:
by Rava
10 Mar 2011, 21:38
Forum: Development
Topic: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)
Replies: 120
Views: 22168

Re: Porteus-v1.0-beta-x86_64 is ready :)

fanthom, no idea why X won't start for me?

Like I said, I will boot it up again in KDE mode, but also without starting X by itself... but now I have a bit work to do and Slax Remix V08 is the only real OS running on that machine.
But hopefully the reason why it won't work will be eliminated...
by Rava
10 Mar 2011, 21:35
Forum: Installation methods (HD, usb sticks, card readers, etc...)
Topic: [HOWTO] boot from a hard disk image file
Replies: 8
Views: 5781

Re: [HOWTO] boot from a hard disk image file

Rootcopy does not use posixvol, so corruption is not an issue. However, permissions and symlinks are not preserved. Symlinks are possible with Windows 7 NTFS, I made a symlink from Boot to boot since I did not want yet another folder in the root of sda2... But you are right, every file including sy...
by Rava
10 Mar 2011, 21:02
Forum: x86_64 xzm module requests
Topic: GIMP
Replies: 6
Views: 2185

Re: GIMP

@Ahau

Will the xzm for 64-bit porteus v1.0 alpha also work with 1.0 beta?

Not that I could run GIMP there ATM, since Xwindows don't start. http://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php? ... t=20#p1951
by Rava
10 Mar 2011, 21:00
Forum: Installation methods (HD, usb sticks, card readers, etc...)
Topic: [HOWTO] boot from a hard disk image file
Replies: 8
Views: 5781

Re: [HOWTO] boot from a hard disk image file

So far I installed Porteus 1.0 alpha the usual way by creating boot and porteus folders. just the rootcopy technique makes me unsure. Part of the readme from the iso says I can use that also in NTFS due to the overlay, while at another place it is said due to that same overlay FS corruption is possi...
by Rava
10 Mar 2011, 20:57
Forum: Development
Topic: [solved] /OS/porteus as default OS hierarchy
Replies: 6
Views: 1236

Re: [solved] /OS/porteus as default OS hierarchy

brokenman wrote:Yes boot time will be a little faster since Porteus is told where to look rather than sniffing down into a directory structure until found.
Good to know then, I will edit menu.lst then. :good: