Wacom Bamboo Capture in kernel?

Post here if you are a new Porteus member and you're looking for some help.
edge226
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 98
Joined: 27 Feb 2012, 23:55
Location: Canada

Re: Wacom Bamboo Capture in kernel?

Post#16 by edge226 » 12 Mar 2012, 23:08

@fanthom
The updates can be found at: https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/for ... m-announce

Latest versions of xf86-input-wacom and input-wacom are all that is needed.

User avatar
fanthom
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4621
Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 02:42
Distribution: Porteus Kiosk
Location: Poland, currently - Cork, IE
Contact:

Re: Wacom Bamboo Capture in kernel?

Post#17 by fanthom » 16 Mar 2012, 08:05

@edge226
got it. will be included in rc2 of Porteus 1.2.
thanks
Please add [Solved] to your thread title if the solution was found.

edge226
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 98
Joined: 27 Feb 2012, 23:55
Location: Canada

[solved] Wacom Bamboo Capture in kernel?

Post#18 by edge226 » 16 Mar 2012, 20:30

@fanthom Great, hardware support is huge for new users switching over ;)

don570
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 99
Joined: 01 Jun 2012, 00:37
Location: Ontario

Re: Wacom Bamboo Capture in kernel?

Post#19 by don570 » 16 Jun 2012, 17:03

I own a wacom digitizing Bamboo tablet
The built-in driver worked without modification for me
with newest porteus 32 bit fxce version
All I had to do was set the Mtpaint preferences for
pressure and tools to screen..... and draw .

Image

_______________________________________________

User avatar
ncmprhnsbl
DEV Team
DEV Team
Posts: 977
Joined: 20 Mar 2012, 03:42
Distribution: 3.2.2-64bit xfce/openbox
Location: australia
Contact:

Re: Wacom Bamboo Capture in kernel?

Post#20 by ncmprhnsbl » 26 Jun 2012, 00:47

i also own a wacom bamboo(older cte 450 so i had kernel support already).
thanks for including the newer driver and kde4 settings in rc2
working fine here(64bit) ....although the pad buttons settings were a bit funny... more investigation needed. ...used to not using em...
Forum Rules : http://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=44

Post Reply