USM bug reports
Re: USM bug reports
I don't understand the reasoning?
Why wasn't system checked (tomorrow) months ago to see if there is a failure somewhere when the same USM errors were being reported that got to the point that Bogomips wanted a Module reserve that Brokenman was happy to go along with as a fix?
I'm completely dumbfounded and confused....
Why wasn't system checked (tomorrow) months ago to see if there is a failure somewhere when the same USM errors were being reported that got to the point that Bogomips wanted a Module reserve that Brokenman was happy to go along with as a fix?
I'm completely dumbfounded and confused....
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
Re: USM bug reports
I don't know about the dumbfounded but you have always been confused.Evan wrote:I'm completely dumbfounded and confused....
Ed
-
- Full of knowledge
- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Re: USM bug reports
Been dabbling with heuristic fix/workaround of sync issue to get package. If anyone desperate enough to try/test, let us know, and I'll share in Intermediate/Advanced section.
flashplayer-plugin
kodi
flashplayer-plugin
Code: Select all
root@porteus:/home/guest# usm -g flashplayer
find: `/tmp/xdg-runtime-guest/gvfs': Permission denied
The following items were found.
Choose an number to confirm.
ctrl+c to quit
1) flashplayer-plugin-11.2.202.635-x86_64-2sl.txz
2) flashplayer-plugin-25.0.0.127-x86_64-1_slonly.txz
3) flashplayer-plugin-25.0.0.148-x86_64-1alien.txz
#? 3
Processing: flashplayer-plugin-25.0.0.148-x86_64-1alien.txz
Ignored libraries: libkdeui.so,libkutils.so,libkdecore.so,libQt,
Libraries required: 22
Libraries found in system: 22
Libraries to resolve: 0
=============
HEURISTIC USM
=============
flashplayer-plugin-25.0.0.148-x86_64-1alien.txz superseded by flashplayer-plugin-25.0.0.171-x86_64-1alien.txz
The following packages are required.
flashplayer-plugin-25.0.0.171-x86_64-1alien.txz [7180K] [upgrade]
Total size: 7 MB
Press [r] to remove packages, [q] to quit, or enter to start downloading.
Code: Select all
kodi_2017-05-30_01:39:46
root@porteus:/home/guest# usm -g kodi
find: `/tmp/xdg-runtime-guest/gvfs': Permission denied
The following items were found.
Choose an number to confirm.
ctrl+c to quit
1) kodi-16.1-x86_64-1gv.txz
2) kodi-17.1-x86_64-1_slonly.txz
#? 2
Processing: kodi-17.1-x86_64-1_slonly.txz
Ignored libraries:
Libraries required: 69
Libraries found in system: 64
Libraries to resolve: 5
Processing library: libcrossguid.so.0
Processing library: libmicrohttpd.so.10
Processing library: libmysqlclient.so.18
More than one package contains: libmysqlclient.so.18
mariadb-10.0.26-x86_64-1.txz 25836K slackware
mariadb-10.0.30-x86_64-1_slack14.2.txz 25952K slackwarepatches
The following items were found.
Choose an number to confirm.
ctrl+c to quit
1) mariadb-10.0.26-x86_64-1.txz
2) mariadb-10.0.30-x86_64-1_slack14.2.txz
#? 2
Processing library: libtinyxml.so.0
Processing library: libyajl.so.2
Processing: crossguid-20160705-x86_64-1_slonly.txz
Ignored libraries:
Libraries required: 4
Libraries found in system: 4
Libraries to resolve: 0
Processing: libmicrohttpd-0.9.42-x86_64-1_slonly.txz
Ignored libraries:
Libraries required: 15
Libraries found in system: 13
Libraries to resolve: 2
Processing library: libmicrospdy.so.0
Processing library: libsasl2.so.2
Processing: mariadb-10.0.30-x86_64-1_slack14.2.txz
Ignored libraries:
Libraries required: 17
Libraries found in system: 16
Libraries to resolve: 1
Processing library: libJudy.so.1
Processing: tinyxml-2.6.2-x86_64-2ponce.txz
Ignored libraries:
Libraries required: 3
Libraries found in system: 3
Libraries to resolve: 0
Processing: yajl-2.1.0-x86_64-2ponce.txz
Ignored libraries:
Libraries required: 1
Libraries found in system: 1
Libraries to resolve: 0
Processing: judy-1.0.5-x86_64-1.txz
WARNING: unresolved dependencies remain.
libsasl2.so.2
=============
HEURISTIC USM
=============
kodi-17.1-x86_64-1_slonly.txz superseded by kodi-17.3-x86_64-1_slonly.txz
The following packages are required.
crossguid-20160705-x86_64-1_slonly.txz [12K] [not installed]
judy-1.0.5-x86_64-1.txz [132K] [not installed]
kodi-17.3-x86_64-1_slonly.txz [32860K] [not installed]
libmicrohttpd-0.9.42-x86_64-1_slonly.txz [224K] [not installed]
mariadb-10.0.30-x86_64-1_slack14.2.txz [25952K] [not installed]
tinyxml-2.6.2-x86_64-2ponce.txz [56K] [not installed]
yajl-2.1.0-x86_64-2ponce.txz [40K] [not installed]
Total size: 59 MB
Multiple packages were detected.
Would you like to merge the packages into one module? [y/n]
Would you like to create a subfolder for the files? [y/n]
Would you like to install the package/s? (custom paths are supported) [y/n]
Press [r] to remove packages, [q] to quit, or enter to start downloading.
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
Re: USM bug reports
Code: Select all
usm -g flashplayer
flashplayer-plugin-25.0.0.148-x86_64-1alien.txz
Code: Select all
usm -s flashplayer
flashplayer-plugin-25.0.0.171-x86_64-1alien.txz
< -g and -s >
Commands shows different package numbers when using the mirrors.
-
- Full of knowledge
- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Re: USM bug reports
^ Old hat. That was what brokenman was trying to fix on Sunday.
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
Re: USM bug reports
I wasn't putting it forward as a new bug , it was in regards to you using -g for the heuristic fix.
-
- Full of knowledge
- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Re: USM bug reports
^ Doesn't matter. Comes out in the wash.
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
Re: USM bug reports
viewtopic.php?f=140&t=6966&p=55568#p55562Bogomips wrote:Been dabbling with heuristic fix/workaround of sync issue to get package. If anyone desperate enough to try/test, let us know, and I'll share in Intermediate/Advanced section.
Ed
- brokenman
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: 27 Dec 2010, 03:50
- Distribution: Porteus v4 all desktops
- Location: Brazil
Re: USM bug reports
Yes it certainly does. As I said I will fix it when I get around to it. If this time frame is not to your liking then you'd best find another package manager. At this moment in my life, the priority is putting food on the table. My real life job does this and my free unpaid hobby does not. Make a nice donation to Porteus and I could consider shuffling my priorities a little, otherwise have patience. Complaining in the manner that you are currently doing does little to motivate me.doesn't logic and reason dictate that the problem is either with USM or the repositories have changed their format that it's no longer compatible with USM and needs to be addressed?
You sound like a paying customer that has a problem with his car that is still under warranty. I ask for a little patience at this time. This half of this year was a big one for me. Things will get better for me, but until they do I have to prioritize my activities.Why wasn't system checked (tomorrow) months ago to see if there is a failure somewhere when the same USM errors were being reported that got to the point that Bogomips wanted a Module reserve that Brokenman was happy to go along with as a fix?
PS:
I'd like to add that USM is quite a complex set of scripts (for my meager abilities). It takes time to dig through, which I have been doing in the early hours of the morning since Sunday, and reading the above just sucked the wind out of my sails.
How do i become super user?
Wear your underpants on the outside and put on a cape.
Wear your underpants on the outside and put on a cape.
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
Re: USM bug reports
Don't be down brokenman. Evan was probably just frustrated when he wrote that. It's not uncommon for frustrated users to make demanding statements. We understand that this is an unpaid hobby for you and real life takes priority over it. And we have faith that you will find the problem and fix it as soon as you can. And know that you have members willing to test whatever fix you may find for you.
Ed
Re: USM bug reports
@Brokenman
WTF!!!
An attempt to understand weeks/months of silence through observational questions is neither a complaint or any type of demand, Its just a desire to understand , be less confused and that someone on here can help make sense of it all.
There is nothing i need from USM so it makes no actual difference to me if or when the issue is resolved , it is however frustrating when there is an issues that doesn't seem to be acknowledged and the blame is put elsewhere...........
I happen to care about your free project and you have effectively thrown that caring in my face.
WTF!!!
This , and what Ed said ---------------^Ed_P wrote:I don't know about the dumbfounded but you have always been confused.Evan wrote:I'm completely dumbfounded and confused....
An attempt to understand weeks/months of silence through observational questions is neither a complaint or any type of demand, Its just a desire to understand , be less confused and that someone on here can help make sense of it all.
There is nothing i need from USM so it makes no actual difference to me if or when the issue is resolved , it is however frustrating when there is an issues that doesn't seem to be acknowledged and the blame is put elsewhere...........
I happen to care about your free project and you have effectively thrown that caring in my face.
- Ed_P
- Contributor
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 22:12
- Distribution: Cinnamon 5.01 ISO
- Location: Western NY, USA
Re: USM bug reports
Alright guys, no more postings after 11pm. People are too tired, emotions too thin.
I was KIDDING!! TEASING. Joking. Good grief. We're friends so I was certainly not trying to insult you.Evan wrote:This , and what Ed said ---------------^
Ed
Re: USM bug reports
Either you misunderstood my post or i'm not very good at articulating myself , i'm guessing the latter.
You never insulted me Buddy , it amused as it was intended , i was agreeing with your joking and your previous posts for the fact that there is some truth in it.
And you're right again about not posting when late and tired , this is like a lovers tiff , maybe i should sleep on the couch.
You never insulted me Buddy , it amused as it was intended , i was agreeing with your joking and your previous posts for the fact that there is some truth in it.
And you're right again about not posting when late and tired , this is like a lovers tiff , maybe i should sleep on the couch.
-
- Full of knowledge
- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 15:21
- Distribution: 3.2.2 Cinnamon & KDE5
- Location: London
Re: USM bug reports
And rightly so! Not pulling your weight? Sleep on couch!Evan wrote:this is like a lovers tiff , maybe i should sleep on the couch.
Linux porteus 4.4.0-porteus #3 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 23 07:01:55 UTC 2016 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 140 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
NVIDIA Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2) MemTotal: 901760 kB MemFree: 66752 kB
- brokenman
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: 27 Dec 2010, 03:50
- Distribution: Porteus v4 all desktops
- Location: Brazil
Re: USM bug reports
In direct reply to my post you wrote:
Then you wrote:
Then you wrote:
Then you wrote:
Then you wrote:
--------
So, that's my rant. It's off my chest and hold no grudges. I just ask for a little patience for this relatively short pause in maintenance.
If someone could check that the LIBS.TXT error is gone I would appreciate it.
Does this NOT seem a little aggressive to you? I have been working non-stop on Porteus for something like 10 years. Many hours per day. That epoc of my life has changed and now I must spend between 11pm and 3am working on it. This pause began 6 months ago. Put yourself in my shoes. You spend that much time of your life giving something free and you are faced with the above reply. And you say I threw something in your face? Please.How many more months do we need to report the same problem and that is getting worse with examples for anyone to realize that waiting 6 hours does not fix anything?
Then you wrote:
The latest version was only released in December/January. The system for a module repository has already been implemented for the last two versions of Porteus. I also made a call to action for people to start populating the repository with "Bundles" which never eventuated, and yes waiting 6 hours DID fix the problem in February. The current problems started in April according to my logs and should now be fixed (I think I located the problem).Bogomips wanted to build a module reserve out of frustration of the same continuing problems back in February, did waiting 6 hours fix the problem?
Then you wrote:
So I am ignoring all logic and reason? I acknowledged the problem. Fixing it was something that would take time. Have you ever tried to dig through the code?doesn't logic and reason dictate that the problem is either with USM or the repositories have changed their format that it's no longer compatible with USM and needs to be addressed?
Then you wrote:
It sure comes across as a major complaint.An attempt to understand weeks/months of silence through observational questions is neither a complaint or any type of demand, Its just a desire to understand , be less confused and that someone on here can help make sense of it all.
Then you wrote:
If it means nothing to you why are you so vocal about it?There is nothing i need from USM so it makes no actual difference to me if or when the issue is resolved
--------
So, that's my rant. It's off my chest and hold no grudges. I just ask for a little patience for this relatively short pause in maintenance.
If someone could check that the LIBS.TXT error is gone I would appreciate it.
How do i become super user?
Wear your underpants on the outside and put on a cape.
Wear your underpants on the outside and put on a cape.